Giskard vs LangSmith

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/giskard-ai-vs-langsmith

Giskard

Test your AI agents to catch issues before they happen in production

Giskard is an open-source and enterprise platform for automated red-teaming and evaluation of AI models and LLM agents, detecting vulnerabilities like hallucinations, prompt injections, biases, and robustness issues through continuous scanning and test suites. It differentiates with black-box testing, collaborative workflows for business and technical teams, and integration of domain knowledge for exhaustive, domain-specific tests. Typical buyers are AI engineering, security, and data science teams at enterprises in finance, manufacturing, public sector, and defense deploying production AI systems. The platform supports compliance via GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA features, and was recognized in Gartner's 2023 Market Guide for AI Trust, Risk and Security Management.

Last verified April 24, 2026Paris, France

LangSmith

AI Agent & LLM Observability Platform

LangSmith is an LLM observability platform that provides tracing, monitoring, and evaluation for AI agents and LLM applications. It offers native tracing for agent frameworks, cost and latency tracking, online LLM-as-judge evals, custom dashboards, and alerts via webhooks or PagerDuty. Framework-agnostic with SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and OpenTelemetry support, it works with OpenAI, Anthropic, LlamaIndex, and custom stacks. Typical buyers are engineering teams building production LLM apps needing visibility into agent behavior, debugging failures, and performance optimization. Enterprise plans include self-hosted and BYOC options for data residency.LangSmith homepage Pricing

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Giskard covers: GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, SOC 2
  • Shared capabilities: 3 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeGiskardLangSmith
Founded20212023
HeadquartersParis, FranceSan Francisco, US
Employees11-5051-200
Funding$4.9M total (Grant, May 2024)$160M total (Series B, Oct 2025)
PricingContact for pricingContact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkGiskardLangSmith
GDPR Art. 22Comprehensive
HIPAAComprehensive
SOC 2Comprehensive

Capabilities

CapabilityGiskardLangSmith
Agent Tracing
Bias & Fairness Testing
Drift Detection
Explainability
LLM Evaluation
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Prompt Management
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Giskard

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Defense & National Security
  • Manufacturing
  • SaaS & Technology

LangSmith

  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Giskard

  • MLflow
  • OpenAI API
  • LiteLLM
  • Ollama

LangSmith

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • OpenTelemetry
  • LlamaIndex

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Giskard and LangSmith and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.