LangSmith vs Weights & Biases Weave
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/langsmith-vs-wb-weaveLangSmith
AI Agent & LLM Observability Platform
LangSmith is an LLM observability platform that provides tracing, monitoring, and evaluation for AI agents and LLM applications. It offers native tracing for agent frameworks, cost and latency tracking, online LLM-as-judge evals, custom dashboards, and alerts via webhooks or PagerDuty. Framework-agnostic with SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and OpenTelemetry support, it works with OpenAI, Anthropic, LlamaIndex, and custom stacks. Typical buyers are engineering teams building production LLM apps needing visibility into agent behavior, debugging failures, and performance optimization. Enterprise plans include self-hosted and BYOC options for data residency.LangSmith homepage Pricing
Weights & Biases Weave
Deliver AI with confidence.
Weights & Biases (W&B) is a San Francisco-based MLOps and LLMOps platform founded in 2017. Weave is W&B's product layer purpose-built for LLM observability, evaluation, and governance. It provides automatic tracing of LLM calls (inputs, outputs, latency, cost), evaluation pipelines with human and automated scoring, dataset versioning, and guardrails to block prompt attacks and harmful outputs. Weave integrates with major LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and frameworks such as LangChain and LlamaIndex. For AI compliance, W&B runs EU AI Act-focused webinar series demonstrating how Weave can generate compliance dossiers for high-risk AI systems, providing audit trails and evidence generation. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Enterprise tier includes SSO, RBAC, and private cloud deployment. W&B has raised $305M total and was valued at $1.25B in 2023.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
- Shared capabilities: 1 of 9 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | LangSmith | Weights & Biases Weave |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, United States |
| Employees | 51-200 | 201-500 |
| Funding | $160M total (Series B, Oct 2025) | Multi-round, $305M total raised across 6 rounds. Most recent: $50M equity round (August 2023) led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman at $1.25B valuation. |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Free tier available for individuals. Team tier at published per-seat pricing. Enterprise tier (SSO, RBAC, private cloud) is contact sales. See https://wandb.ai/site/pricing for current tiers. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | LangSmith | Weights & Biases Weave |
|---|
Capabilities
| Capability | LangSmith | Weights & Biases Weave |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Agent Tracing | ✓ | — |
| Audit Evidence Collection | — | ✓ |
| Drift Detection | ✓ | — |
| Explainability | — | ✓ |
| LLM Evaluation | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt Management | ✓ | — |
Industries served
LangSmith
- SaaS & Technology
Weights & Biases Weave
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
LangSmith
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- OpenTelemetry
- LlamaIndex
Weights & Biases Weave
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- Weights & Biases
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to LangSmith and Weights & Biases Weave and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.