LangSmith vs Weights & Biases Weave

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/langsmith-vs-wb-weave

LangSmith

AI Agent & LLM Observability Platform

LangSmith is an LLM observability platform that provides tracing, monitoring, and evaluation for AI agents and LLM applications. It offers native tracing for agent frameworks, cost and latency tracking, online LLM-as-judge evals, custom dashboards, and alerts via webhooks or PagerDuty. Framework-agnostic with SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and OpenTelemetry support, it works with OpenAI, Anthropic, LlamaIndex, and custom stacks. Typical buyers are engineering teams building production LLM apps needing visibility into agent behavior, debugging failures, and performance optimization. Enterprise plans include self-hosted and BYOC options for data residency.LangSmith homepage Pricing

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

Weights & Biases Weave

Deliver AI with confidence.

Weights & Biases (W&B) is a San Francisco-based MLOps and LLMOps platform founded in 2017. Weave is W&B's product layer purpose-built for LLM observability, evaluation, and governance. It provides automatic tracing of LLM calls (inputs, outputs, latency, cost), evaluation pipelines with human and automated scoring, dataset versioning, and guardrails to block prompt attacks and harmful outputs. Weave integrates with major LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and frameworks such as LangChain and LlamaIndex. For AI compliance, W&B runs EU AI Act-focused webinar series demonstrating how Weave can generate compliance dossiers for high-risk AI systems, providing audit trails and evidence generation. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Enterprise tier includes SSO, RBAC, and private cloud deployment. W&B has raised $305M total and was valued at $1.25B in 2023.

Last verified April 22, 2026San Francisco, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Shared capabilities: 1 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeLangSmithWeights & Biases Weave
Founded20232017
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USSan Francisco, United States
Employees51-200201-500
Funding$160M total (Series B, Oct 2025)Multi-round, $305M total raised across 6 rounds. Most recent: $50M equity round (August 2023) led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman at $1.25B valuation.
PricingContact for pricingFree tier available for individuals. Team tier at published per-seat pricing. Enterprise tier (SSO, RBAC, private cloud) is contact sales. See https://wandb.ai/site/pricing for current tiers.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkLangSmithWeights & Biases Weave

Capabilities

CapabilityLangSmithWeights & Biases Weave
AI Model Inventory
Agent Tracing
Audit Evidence Collection
Drift Detection
Explainability
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
Model Monitoring
Prompt Management

Industries served

LangSmith

  • SaaS & Technology

Weights & Biases Weave

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

LangSmith

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • OpenTelemetry
  • LlamaIndex

Weights & Biases Weave

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Weights & Biases

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to LangSmith and Weights & Biases Weave and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.