Drata vs Scrut Automation

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/drata-vs-scrut-automation

Drata

Modern GRC, Compliance & Trust Automation

Drata is a compliance automation platform that continuously monitors security controls, automates evidence collection, and supports multiple frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 42001 for AI management systems. It differentiates through AI-powered features like policy-to-control mapping, questionnaire automation, and risk workflows, targeting enterprises needing scalable GRC to accelerate audits, manage vendor risks, and demonstrate trust. Typical buyers are security and compliance teams in SaaS, tech, and regulated sectors; recent developments include opening a San Francisco HQ and SafeBase acquisition for enhanced trust centers.

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

Scrut Automation

Security-First GRC for Modern Risk & Compliance

Scrut Automation is a cloud-based GRC platform that automates compliance management, risk assessment, and audit preparation for growth-stage SaaS and cloud-native companies. It differentiates through continuous monitoring of 230+ security controls, automated evidence collection from 75+ integrations, and support for 70+ frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001, enabling multi-framework compliance without redundancy. Typical buyers are CISOs and compliance teams at startups and mid-market firms seeking to accelerate audits, reduce manual work, and maintain real-time visibility into cloud, application, people, and third-party risks. Featured in Forrester's GRC Platforms Landscape, it has raised $20.5M total funding, with the latest $10M growth round in 2024 from Lightspeed, MassMutual Ventures, and Endiya Partners to enhance AI capabilities and expand in North America and Europe.

Last verified April 24, 2026Palo Alto, US

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2
  • Only Scrut Automation covers: ISO 27001, PCI DSS
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 7 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeDrataScrut Automation
Founded20202021
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USPalo Alto, US
Employees501-100051-200
Funding$328M total (Series C, 2022)$20.5M total (Growth, April 2024)
PricingContact for pricingContact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkDrataScrut Automation
GDPR Art. 22PartialComprehensive
HIPAAComprehensiveComprehensive
ISO 27001Comprehensive
ISO/IEC 42001ComprehensiveComprehensive
NIST AI RMFComprehensiveComprehensive
PCI DSSComprehensive
SOC 2ComprehensiveComprehensive

Capabilities

CapabilityDrataScrut Automation
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Risk Management

Industries served

Drata

  • SaaS & Technology
  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector

Scrut Automation

  • SaaS & Technology
  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare

Integrations

Drata

  • Okta
  • Slack
  • GitHub
  • AWS SageMaker
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Microsoft Entra ID
  • Rippling

Scrut Automation

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Okta
  • Jira
  • Slack
  • GitHub
  • Azure ML

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Drata and Scrut Automation and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.