Giskard vs TrojAI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/giskard-ai-vs-trojai

Giskard

Test your AI agents to catch issues before they happen in production

Giskard is an open-source and enterprise platform for automated red-teaming and evaluation of AI models and LLM agents, detecting vulnerabilities like hallucinations, prompt injections, biases, and robustness issues through continuous scanning and test suites. It differentiates with black-box testing, collaborative workflows for business and technical teams, and integration of domain knowledge for exhaustive, domain-specific tests. Typical buyers are AI engineering, security, and data science teams at enterprises in finance, manufacturing, public sector, and defense deploying production AI systems. The platform supports compliance via GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA features, and was recognized in Gartner's 2023 Market Guide for AI Trust, Risk and Security Management.

Last verified April 24, 2026Paris, France

TrojAI

Deploy AI Agents with Confidence.

TrojAI is a Saint John, New Brunswick-based AI security company founded in 2019 by James Stewart and Stephen Goddard. The company provides an enterprise AI security platform with two core products: TrojAI Detect (pre-deployment model red teaming and vulnerability assessment) and TrojAI Defend (runtime AI firewall for AI applications and agents). In 2025, TrojAI extended Defend to cover MCP (Model Context Protocol) server governance, providing visibility and policy enforcement for agentic AI workflows. TrojAI serves primarily large enterprise customers in financial services and technology, helping them align with NIST, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and CSA frameworks. The company participated in Google's 2023 accelerator program for Canadian startups and was listed on the Vector Institute's '20 Canadian AI Startups to Watch.' TrojAI raised $5.75M in seed capital in April 2024 and maintains offices in Saint John, Fredericton, and Boston.

Last verified April 22, 2026Saint John, Canada

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Giskard covers: GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, SOC 2
  • Only TrojAI covers: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 10 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeGiskardTrojAI
Founded20212019
HeadquartersParis, FranceSaint John, Canada
Employees11-5011-50
Funding$4.9M total (Grant, May 2024)Seed, $5.75M raised (April 2024), led by Flying Fish with participation from Build Ventures, Techstars, Alteryx Ventures, and Flybridge Capital Partners. Prior seed of $3M (2022). Total raised approximately $8M.
PricingContact for pricingEnterprise-only, no public pricing. Contact sales at troj.ai.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkGiskardTrojAI
EU AI ActPartial
GDPR Art. 22Comprehensive
HIPAAComprehensive
NIST AI RMFPartial
SOC 2Comprehensive

Capabilities

CapabilityGiskardTrojAI
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Drift Detection
Explainability
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Giskard

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Defense & National Security
  • Manufacturing
  • SaaS & Technology

TrojAI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Defense & National Security

Integrations

Giskard

  • MLflow
  • OpenAI API
  • LiteLLM
  • Ollama

TrojAI

  • OpenAI API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Giskard and TrojAI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.