When does the EU AI Act high-risk system deadline take effect?+
December 2, 2027 for stand-alone high-risk systems listed in Annex III, and August 2, 2028 for AI that is, or is a safety component of, a product covered by the EU laws listed in Annex I. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus on AI), published in the Official Journal on July 24, 2026 and in force since July 27, 2026, deferred both from the original August 2026 and August 2027 dates. Other dates: prohibited practices (Article 5) since February 2, 2025; general-purpose AI (GPAI) model obligations since August 2, 2025, enforceable by the AI Office from August 2, 2026, with a deadline of August 2, 2027 for models placed on the market before August 2, 2025; Article 50 transparency obligations from August 2, 2026; and December 2, 2026 both for the new bans on AI that generates non-consensual sexual content or child sexual abuse material and for marking AI-generated content from generative systems already on the market before August 2, 2026.
Did the EU delay the August 2026 high-risk deadline?+
Yes. The Commission proposed the Digital Omnibus on AI on November 19, 2025, so that harmonised standards and other support tools would be in place before the high-risk rules apply. The Council and Parliament reached a provisional agreement on May 7, 2026, Parliament adopted the text on June 16, 2026, and Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, dated July 8, 2026, entered into force on July 27, 2026. Annex III high-risk obligations now apply from December 2, 2027 and Annex I obligations from August 2, 2028. The August 2, 2026 date still applied to Article 50 transparency obligations.
What are the fines for EU AI Act non-compliance?+
Under Article 99 of Regulation 2024/1689: prohibited practices (Article 5) — up to €35M or 7% of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. Breaches of operator obligations, including high-risk provider duties (Article 16), deployer duties (Article 26) and Article 50 transparency duties — up to €15M or 3%. Supplying incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to notified bodies or national authorities — up to €7.5M or 1%. Providers of general-purpose AI models face separate Commission fines of up to €15M or 3% (Article 101). The percentage applies to total worldwide turnover for the preceding financial year, not EU-only revenue. SMEs and start-ups pay up to the lower of the two caps; after the Digital Omnibus, small mid-caps (SMCs) also get the lower cap for the €15M and €7.5M tiers (Article 99(6a)).
Can an existing GRC platform handle EU AI Act compliance?+
Existing GRC platforms handle documentation and evidence collection well for lower-risk systems. For high-risk AI under Annex III, technical requirements — bias testing, drift monitoring, data governance, post-market monitoring — require AI-specific capabilities GRC tools typically do not provide standalone. Holistic AI combines model testing with governance, while Credo AI and Saidot focus on classification, policy and evidence; teams already on Vanta can extend with cross-mapping (Drata does not list the EU AI Act as a framework) but should validate Article-level workflow depth during evaluation.
What is the typical cost range for EU AI Act compliance software?+
Published prices where available: IBM watsonx.governance Model Management from $0.64 pay-as-you-go and Risk & Compliance Basic from $3,500/month; Vanta's Essentials package from $14,000/year for 1-20 employees on AWS Marketplace (one framework). Modulos AI quotes bespoke pricing and says dedicated AI governance platforms run from about $50,000 a year for a focused mid-market deployment. Credo AI, Holistic AI and Asenion (formerly Fairly AI) publish no prices; Saidot's pricing page showed none in October 2026, though G2 lists Saidot plans from €1,000 a month (updated May 2026). Conformity-assessment legal review and Notified Body fees are separate from software costs.