Colorado’s original AI Act, SB 24-205, was repealed and replaced in May 2026 by SB 26-189, a narrower law on automated decision-making technology (ADMT) used in consequential decisions about consumers in areas such as employment, education, housing, financial services, insurance, healthcare and essential government services. SB 26-189 takes effect January 1, 2027. It shifts from SB 24-205’s risk-management and impact-assessment regime to a notice-based approach: developers must give deployers documentation about intended uses, known limitations and training-data categories; deployers must notify consumers that ADMT is used and, after an adverse outcome, explain the decision within 30 days and offer data correction and human review where commercially reasonable. Enforcement is by the Colorado Attorney General, with a 60-day cure period that sunsets January 1, 2030.
Jurisdiction
US
Enforcement
SB 24-205 repealed. Replacement law SB 26-189 takes effect January 1, 2027 (Colorado Attorney General enforcement).
Maximum penalty
Enforced by the Colorado AG under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act
Repealed & replaced — new law effective 1 Jan 2027
Federal court order blocks enforcement of SB 24-205
SB 26-189 signed, repealing and replacing SB 24-205
Today ·
· 72 days
SB 26-189 takes effect
· 1,168 days
60-day right-to-cure provision sunsets
Deadline Facts
Takes effect
72 days
Applies to Developers and deployers of automated decision-making technology used in consequential decisions about consumers
Enforced by Colorado Attorney General · 60-day cure period until 1 Jan 2030
Status reviewed 1 Oct 2026
Status reviewed 1 Oct 2026. Sources: Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189 Automated Decision-Making Technology; Finnegan — Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of SB 26-189; McDermott Will & Schulte — Colorado AI law in flux; Buchalter — Colorado Rewrites Its AI Law: SB 26-189. Not legal advice.
Sorted by coverage level. Full coverage shown first.
9 vendors
| Vendor | HQ | Founded | Size | Pricing | Coverage | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitaur | Boston, United States | 2019 | 11-50 | Enterprise annual subscription; no public pricing listed. Forrester Wave cited 'pricing flexibility and transparency' as a highest-score criterion. Contact sales for quotes. | Full | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Trustible | Arlington, United States | 2023 | 11-50 | Contact sales for enterprise pricing; no public plans listed | Full | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Luminos.Law (ZwillGen AI Division) | Washington, DC, United States | 2019 | 51-200 | Contact for pricing | Comprehensive | Oct 1, 2026 |
| DataRobot | Boston, United States | 2012 | 1000+ | Contact for pricing | Comprehensive | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Fairly AI | Kitchener, Canada | 2020 | 11-50 | On-premises or private-cloud deployments; quote-based. | Partial | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Credo AI | Palo Alto, United States | 2020 | 51-200 | Contact sales for enterprise subscription quote. | Partial | Sep 21, 2026 |
| TrustArc | Walnut Creek, United States | 1997 | 501-1000 | Enterprise subscription; contact sales for quote; modular pricing based on scope and modules | Partial | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Meilynx | United States | — | — | Contact for pricing | Partial | Sep 21, 2026 |
| ORCAA | New York City, United States | 2016 | 1-10 | Contact for pricing | Adjacent | Sep 21, 2026 |
Independent ranking with documented criteria.
See our top picks for Colorado AI ActIn-depth answers about Colorado AI Act.
See which vendors support Colorado AI Act in your sector.
Legal status reviewed October 1, 2026. Informational summary only — not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for specific obligations.