BABL AI vs Prompt Security
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/babl-ai-vs-prompt-securityBABL AI
Pioneering Responsible AI Solutions Since 2018.
BABL AI is an audit firm specializing in independent third-party audits of AI systems for ethical, safety, compliance, liability, and reputational risks. It offers AI audits aligned with regulations like NYC Local Law 144, EU AI Act preparation, ISO 42001 certification, and others including Digital Services Act and EEOC. The firm conducts documentation reviews, stakeholder interviews, and bias testing without software integrations. BABL AI also provides Responsible AI consulting, online certification programs for AI auditors, and research through The Algorithmic Bias Lab. Typical buyers include HR/recruiting firms like iCIMS and HackerRank needing compliance assurance for employment AI tools.
Prompt Security
Prompt Security is the AI security company helping you manage GenAI risks.
Prompt Security is a Tel Aviv-based AI security company founded in August 2023 by Itamar Golan (CEO) and Lior Drihem (CTO), both alumni of Israel's elite Unit 8200 with prior experience at Check Point and Orca Security. The company provides an enterprise platform for securing all generative AI interactions — covering employee AI tool usage (shadow AI discovery, data protection), homegrown AI applications (prompt injection defense, output filtering), AI code assistants, and agentic AI security including MCP gateway protection. Prompt Security is a core contributor to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications. The company raised $23M prior to its acquisition by SentinelOne, which was completed on September 5, 2025. Prompt Security continues to operate as a standalone platform and product brand within SentinelOne's Singularity platform. CRN named it a 2025 Stellar Startup in Security.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001
- Only BABL AI covers: GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
- Only Prompt Security covers: NIST AI RMF
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 10 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | BABL AI | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Iowa City, US | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 11-50 | 11-50 |
| Funding | Undisclosed | Series A, $23M total raised ($5M seed 2023, $18M Series A Nov 2024 led by Jump Capital). Acquired by SentinelOne, completed September 5, 2025 for approximately $180–$250M in cash and stock. |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Now part of SentinelOne Singularity Platform. Continues as a standalone product. Enterprise pricing only; contact sales or SentinelOne. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | BABL AI | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | Full |
| GDPR Art. 22 | adjacent | — |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Comprehensive | Full |
| NIST AI RMF | — | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | Comprehensive | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | BABL AI | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | — | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | — | ✓ |
| Policy Management | — | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | — | ✓ |
Industries served
BABL AI
- Employment & HR
Prompt Security
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Employment & HR
- Education
- SaaS & Technology
- Retail & E-commerce
Integrations
BABL AI
- None listed
Prompt Security
- Okta
- Slack
- OpenAI API
- GitHub
- Azure Entra ID
- Jira
- Anthropic API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to BABL AI and Prompt Security and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.