AI Compliance Vendors

Modulos vs ServiceNow AI Control Tower

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/modulos-vs-servicenow-ai-governance

Modulos

AI governance platform for regulatory compliance and risk management

Modulos AG develops the Modulos AI Governance Platform, a software solution that unifies compliance officers, data scientists, risk managers, and business users to manage AI governance, risk, and compliance. The platform provides AI lifecycle tracking, project dashboards, ownership workflows, audit trails, and a shared control graph connecting frameworks, requirements, controls, and evidence, powered by agentic AI like Scout for automation. It supports regulated enterprises by enabling continuous monitoring, monetary risk quantification, evidence collection from engineering stacks, and alignment with multiple regulatory frameworks including EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and NIST AI RMF, reducing compliance effort through shared controls. Targeted at sectors like financial services, insurance, and critical infrastructure, it addresses challenges in multi-framework compliance without silos or duplicate work. Distinct from others, Modulos is the first AI governance platform certified to ISO 42001 and emphasizes human-in-the-loop AI agents for operational efficiency.https://modulos.ai, LinkedIn, AI compliance blog

Last verified April 26, 2026Zurich, CH

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

Take control of any AI from a central intelligent hub — connect your AI strategy, governance, and management across the enterprise.

ServiceNow AI Control Tower is a centralized AI governance platform built on the ServiceNow AI Platform (CMDB and CSDM 5.0), enabling enterprises to discover, inventory, and govern AI assets across their entire ecosystem—including internally built, third-party, and agent-driven AI. The product provides automated AI asset discovery, risk and compliance management aligned to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act, lifecycle management, third-party AI risk assessment, and integration with ServiceNow's Integrated Risk Management (IRM) and IT Service Management (ITSM) modules. ServiceNow has signed the EU AI Code of Practice.

Last verified April 26, 2026Santa Clara, USA

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Modulos covers: ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2
  • Only ServiceNow AI Control Tower covers: FedRAMP, GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, PCI DSS
  • Shared capabilities: 7 of 13 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeModulosServiceNow AI Control Tower
Founded20182004
HeadquartersZurich, CHSanta Clara, USA
Employees11-501000+
FundingSeed VC, $6.3M, 2023, investors include Variant Fund and 1kxUndisclosed
PricingNo public pricing listed on vendor site; third-party sites mention starting from CHF 15,000 but not confirmed by ModulosContact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkModulosServiceNow AI Control Tower
EU AI ActPartialPartial
FedRAMPPartial
GDPR Art. 22Partial
HIPAAPartial
ISO/IEC 42001Partial
NIST AI RMFPartialPartial
PCI DSSPartial
SOC 2Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityModulosServiceNow AI Control Tower
AI Incident Response
AI Model Inventory
Agent Tracing
Audit Evidence Collection
Audit Logging
Drift Detection
LLM Observability
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Risk Management
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Modulos

  • None listed

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

  • None listed

Integrations

Modulos

  • None listed

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

  • None listed

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Modulos and ServiceNow AI Control Tower and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.