Collibra AI Governance vs Fiddler AI
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/collibra-ai-governance-vs-fiddler-aiCollibra AI Governance
AI governance platform for compliant, trusted AI
Collibra AI Governance is a platform that centralizes management of AI use cases, models, and agents with full visibility, trusted data, automated documentation, and built-in compliance features. It supports teams in scaling AI responsibly by providing end-to-end lineage from source data through model training, inference, deployment, and usage across platforms like AWS, Azure, Google, Databricks, SAP, and MLflow. The solution facilitates risk assessment using templates for EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, policy enforcement, model registries, and ongoing monitoring to ensure audit-readiness and regulatory adherence, particularly for regulated industries such as financial services and healthcare. Distinct from narrower tools, it integrates data governance with AI oversight in a unified system of record, enabling cross-team collaboration between AI, data, and risk functions while recommending governed data products to reduce risks from poor data quality or bias.
Fiddler AI
AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.
Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
- Shared capabilities: 6 of 9 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Collibra AI Governance | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Employees | 1000+ | 51-200 |
| Funding | Series G, $250M, 2021, valuing at $5.25B; total ~$595M | $100M total (Series C, January 2026) |
| Pricing | Enterprise subscription; contact sales for custom quote based on users, assets, modules. | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Collibra AI Governance | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | — | Partial |
| EU AI Act | Full | Partial |
| GDPR Art. 22 | — | Partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Partial |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | — | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | Collibra AI Governance | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | — | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | — | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Collibra AI Governance
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Retail & E-commerce
Fiddler AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Retail & E-commerce
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
Integrations
Collibra AI Governance
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- ServiceNow
- Slack
- Jira
Fiddler AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- Weights & Biases
- Okta
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Collibra AI Governance and Fiddler AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.