Credo AI vs Lakera
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/credo-ai-vs-lakeraCredo AI
Context-driven AI governance for regulated enterprises.
Credo AI is an AI governance platform founded in 2020 and headquartered in San Francisco. The platform helps enterprises operationalize AI governance through a centralized model registry, guided impact assessments, policy packs mapped to regulations like the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, and evidence collection for audit. Credo AI has been cited as an NIST AI RMF contributor and has raised approximately $41.3M total, with a $21M round in July 2024 at a reported $101M post-money valuation.
Lakera
The leading security platform to secure your AI future.
Lakera is a Zurich-based AI security company founded in 2021 by former Google, Meta, and aerospace engineers. The company provides the Lakera Guard platform, which offers real-time prompt injection prevention, data leakage protection, jailbreak detection, and AI agent security for enterprise generative AI deployments. It operates across workforce AI security, AI agent security, and AI red teaming, with sub-50ms runtime latency and a SaaS-first, API-first architecture. Lakera is the creator of Gandalf, a widely used AI security educational game with over 1 million players and 80M+ prompts collected, which provides a continuously updated threat intelligence database. The company is cited in the OWASP LLM and GenAI Security Landscape Guide 2025, recognized as a Representative Vendor in the 2024 Gartner Innovation Guide for Generative AI (TRiSM), and had Lakera's CEO join the World Economic Forum 2024 alongside Yann LeCun and others. Named customers include Dropbox and a top-3 US bank.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
- Only Credo AI covers: Colorado AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
- Shared capabilities: 6 of 11 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Credo AI | Lakera |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Employees | 51-200 | 51-100 |
| Funding | $41.3M total (Series B, July 2024) | Series A, $20M raised (July 2024), led by Atomico with participation from Citi Ventures, Dropbox Ventures, and redalpine. Prior seed of $10M (2023) led by redalpine. Total raised: $30M. |
| Pricing | Enterprise-only; typical engagements start in the mid-five figures annually. | Enterprise-focused SaaS. No public pricing listed. API-based pricing model expected. Contact sales. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Credo AI | Lakera |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Full | — |
| EU AI Act | Full | Partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | — |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | Full | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Credo AI | Lakera |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | — |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | — |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Explainability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Credo AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Education
- Defense & National Security
Lakera
- SaaS & Technology
- Education
- Financial Services
Integrations
Credo AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- Jira
- ServiceNow
- Slack
- GitHub
Lakera
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Credo AI and Lakera and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.