Credo AI vs Protect AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/credo-ai-vs-protect-ai

Credo AI

Context-driven AI governance for regulated enterprises.

Credo AI is an AI governance platform founded in 2020 and headquartered in San Francisco. The platform helps enterprises operationalize AI governance through a centralized model registry, guided impact assessments, policy packs mapped to regulations like the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, and evidence collection for audit. Credo AI has been cited as an NIST AI RMF contributor and has raised approximately $41.3M total, with a $21M round in July 2024 at a reported $101M post-money valuation.

Last verified April 21, 2026San Francisco, United States

Protect AI

The Platform for AI Security

Protect AI was a Seattle-based MLSecOps company founded in 2022 by Ian Swanson, Daryan Dehghanpisheh, and Badar Ahmed that built a comprehensive AI and ML security platform. The platform comprised three main products — Guardian (model scanning and supply-chain security), Recon (AI red teaming), and Layer (runtime monitoring) — operating on a unified platform. The company was backed by 17,000+ security researchers via its huntr community and partnered with Hugging Face on threat research. Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks on July 22, 2025 and its technology has been integrated into Prisma AIRS (AI Runtime Security), Palo Alto's comprehensive AI security platform. Prior to acquisition the company had raised $108.5M total ($14M seed in December 2022, $35M Series A in July 2023, $60M Series B in August 2024), all led by Evolution Equity Partners.

Last verified April 22, 2026Seattle, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: NIST AI RMF
  • Only Credo AI covers: Colorado AI Act, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeCredo AIProtect AI
Founded20202022
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesSeattle, United States
Employees51-20051-200
Funding$41.3M total (Series B, July 2024)Series B, $108.5M total raised ($14M seed Dec 2022, $35M Series A Jul 2023, $60M Series B Aug 2024) led by Evolution Equity Partners. Acquired by Palo Alto Networks, completed July 22, 2025.
PricingEnterprise-only; typical engagements start in the mid-five figures annually.Now integrated into Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS. Original standalone Protect AI pricing was enterprise-only, contact sales. Current pricing through Palo Alto Networks.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkCredo AIProtect AI
Colorado AI ActFull
EU AI ActFull
ISO/IEC 42001Full
NIST AI RMFFullPartial
NYC LL 144Full

Capabilities

CapabilityCredo AIProtect AI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Credo AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Education
  • Defense & National Security

Protect AI

  • Defense & National Security
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector

Integrations

Credo AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Jira
  • ServiceNow
  • Slack
  • GitHub

Protect AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Databricks

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Credo AI and Protect AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.