Credo AI vs TrojAI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/credo-ai-vs-trojai

Credo AI

Context-driven AI governance for regulated enterprises.

Credo AI is an AI governance platform founded in 2020 and headquartered in San Francisco. The platform helps enterprises operationalize AI governance through a centralized model registry, guided impact assessments, policy packs mapped to regulations like the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, and evidence collection for audit. Credo AI has been cited as an NIST AI RMF contributor and has raised approximately $41.3M total, with a $21M round in July 2024 at a reported $101M post-money valuation.

Last verified April 21, 2026San Francisco, United States

TrojAI

Deploy AI Agents with Confidence.

TrojAI is a Saint John, New Brunswick-based AI security company founded in 2019 by James Stewart and Stephen Goddard. The company provides an enterprise AI security platform with two core products: TrojAI Detect (pre-deployment model red teaming and vulnerability assessment) and TrojAI Defend (runtime AI firewall for AI applications and agents). In 2025, TrojAI extended Defend to cover MCP (Model Context Protocol) server governance, providing visibility and policy enforcement for agentic AI workflows. TrojAI serves primarily large enterprise customers in financial services and technology, helping them align with NIST, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and CSA frameworks. The company participated in Google's 2023 accelerator program for Canadian startups and was listed on the Vector Institute's '20 Canadian AI Startups to Watch.' TrojAI raised $5.75M in seed capital in April 2024 and maintains offices in Saint John, Fredericton, and Boston.

Last verified April 22, 2026Saint John, Canada

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Credo AI covers: Colorado AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 7 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeCredo AITrojAI
Founded20202019
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesSaint John, Canada
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$41.3M total (Series B, July 2024)Seed, $5.75M raised (April 2024), led by Flying Fish with participation from Build Ventures, Techstars, Alteryx Ventures, and Flybridge Capital Partners. Prior seed of $3M (2022). Total raised approximately $8M.
PricingEnterprise-only; typical engagements start in the mid-five figures annually.Enterprise-only, no public pricing. Contact sales at troj.ai.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkCredo AITrojAI
Colorado AI ActFull
EU AI ActFullPartial
ISO/IEC 42001Full
NIST AI RMFFullPartial
NYC LL 144Full

Capabilities

CapabilityCredo AITrojAI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Credo AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Education
  • Defense & National Security

TrojAI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Defense & National Security

Integrations

Credo AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Jira
  • ServiceNow
  • Slack
  • GitHub

TrojAI

  • OpenAI API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Credo AI and TrojAI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.