Enzai vs Fiddler AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/enzai-vs-fiddler-ai

Enzai

AI Governance & Enablement Technology.

Enzai is a Belfast, Northern Ireland-based AI governance software company founded in August 2021 by Ryan Donnelly (a leading AI regulation lawyer) and Jack Carlisle (a software engineer). The company builds an enterprise AI governance and enablement platform — branded AI Comply — that helps organizations build AI system inventories, apply policies, map compliance to global regulatory frameworks (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST RMF, GDPR), conduct automated risk assessments, and generate audit-ready reports. Enzai was incorporated on August 13, 2021 (UK Companies House number NI681546) and raised a $4M seed round in September 2023 led by Cavalry Ventures with participation from Seedcamp, Techstart Ventures, and angels. The company holds ISO 27001 certification (since 2023, audited annually by NQA) and integrates with over 50 enterprise tools. Enzai serves financial services, healthcare, insurance, HR, and government customers globally.

Last verified April 22, 2026Belfast, United Kingdom

Fiddler AI

AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.

Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.

Last verified April 21, 2026Palo Alto, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeEnzaiFiddler AI
Founded20212018
HeadquartersBelfast, United KingdomPalo Alto, United States
Employees2-1051-200
FundingSeed, $4M raised (September 2023), led by Cavalry Ventures with participation from Seedcamp, Techstart Ventures, and angels including Paul Forster (Indeed.com founder), Sam Gill (Sylvera), and Alexandre Berriche (Fleet).$100M total (Series C, January 2026)
PricingSaaS platform, enterprise subscription. No public pricing listed. Contact sales via enz.ai.Contact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkEnzaiFiddler AI
Colorado AI ActPartial
EU AI ActFullPartial
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001FullPartial
NIST AI RMFFullPartial
NYC LL 144Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityEnzaiFiddler AI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Enzai

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Legal Services
  • SaaS & Technology

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

Integrations

Enzai

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Google Vertex AI

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Weights & Biases
  • Okta
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Enzai and Fiddler AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.