Enzai vs Fiddler AI
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/enzai-vs-fiddler-aiEnzai
AI Governance & Enablement Technology.
Enzai is a Belfast, Northern Ireland-based AI governance software company founded in August 2021 by Ryan Donnelly (a leading AI regulation lawyer) and Jack Carlisle (a software engineer). The company builds an enterprise AI governance and enablement platform — branded AI Comply — that helps organizations build AI system inventories, apply policies, map compliance to global regulatory frameworks (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST RMF, GDPR), conduct automated risk assessments, and generate audit-ready reports. Enzai was incorporated on August 13, 2021 (UK Companies House number NI681546) and raised a $4M seed round in September 2023 led by Cavalry Ventures with participation from Seedcamp, Techstart Ventures, and angels. The company holds ISO 27001 certification (since 2023, audited annually by NQA) and integrates with over 50 enterprise tools. Enzai serves financial services, healthcare, insurance, HR, and government customers globally.
Fiddler AI
AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.
Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 11 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Enzai | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, United Kingdom | Palo Alto, United States |
| Employees | 2-10 | 51-200 |
| Funding | Seed, $4M raised (September 2023), led by Cavalry Ventures with participation from Seedcamp, Techstart Ventures, and angels including Paul Forster (Indeed.com founder), Sam Gill (Sylvera), and Alexandre Berriche (Fleet). | $100M total (Series C, January 2026) |
| Pricing | SaaS platform, enterprise subscription. No public pricing listed. Contact sales via enz.ai. | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Enzai | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | — | Partial |
| EU AI Act | Full | Partial |
| GDPR Art. 22 | — | Partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Partial |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | — | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | Enzai | Fiddler AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | — | ✓ |
| Explainability | — | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | — | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | — |
Industries served
Enzai
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Legal Services
- SaaS & Technology
Fiddler AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Retail & E-commerce
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
Integrations
Enzai
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- Google Vertex AI
Fiddler AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- Weights & Biases
- Okta
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Enzai and Fiddler AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.