Fiddler AI vs Prompt Security

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-prompt-security

Fiddler AI

AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.

Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.

Last verified April 21, 2026Palo Alto, United States

Prompt Security

Prompt Security is the AI security company helping you manage GenAI risks.

Prompt Security is a Tel Aviv-based AI security company founded in August 2023 by Itamar Golan (CEO) and Lior Drihem (CTO), both alumni of Israel's elite Unit 8200 with prior experience at Check Point and Orca Security. The company provides an enterprise platform for securing all generative AI interactions — covering employee AI tool usage (shadow AI discovery, data protection), homegrown AI applications (prompt injection defense, output filtering), AI code assistants, and agentic AI security including MCP gateway protection. Prompt Security is a core contributor to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications. The company raised $23M prior to its acquisition by SentinelOne, which was completed on September 5, 2025. Prompt Security continues to operate as a standalone platform and product brand within SentinelOne's Singularity platform. CRN named it a 2025 Stellar Startup in Security.

Last verified April 22, 2026Tel Aviv, Israel

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 8 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeFiddler AIPrompt Security
Founded20182023
HeadquartersPalo Alto, United StatesTel Aviv, Israel
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$100M total (Series C, January 2026)Series A, $23M total raised ($5M seed 2023, $18M Series A Nov 2024 led by Jump Capital). Acquired by SentinelOne, completed September 5, 2025 for approximately $180–$250M in cash and stock.
PricingContact for pricingNow part of SentinelOne Singularity Platform. Continues as a standalone product. Enterprise pricing only; contact sales or SentinelOne.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkFiddler AIPrompt Security
Colorado AI ActPartial
EU AI ActPartialFull
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001PartialFull
NIST AI RMFPartialPartial
NYC LL 144Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityFiddler AIPrompt Security
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

Prompt Security

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Employment & HR
  • Education
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Retail & E-commerce

Integrations

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Weights & Biases
  • Okta
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

Prompt Security

  • Okta
  • Slack
  • OpenAI API
  • GitHub
  • Azure Entra ID
  • Jira
  • Anthropic API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and Prompt Security and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.