Fiddler AI vs Protect AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-protect-ai

Fiddler AI

AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.

Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.

Last verified April 21, 2026Palo Alto, United States

Protect AI

The Platform for AI Security

Protect AI was a Seattle-based MLSecOps company founded in 2022 by Ian Swanson, Daryan Dehghanpisheh, and Badar Ahmed that built a comprehensive AI and ML security platform. The platform comprised three main products — Guardian (model scanning and supply-chain security), Recon (AI red teaming), and Layer (runtime monitoring) — operating on a unified platform. The company was backed by 17,000+ security researchers via its huntr community and partnered with Hugging Face on threat research. Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks on July 22, 2025 and its technology has been integrated into Prisma AIRS (AI Runtime Security), Palo Alto's comprehensive AI security platform. Prior to acquisition the company had raised $108.5M total ($14M seed in December 2022, $35M Series A in July 2023, $60M Series B in August 2024), all led by Evolution Equity Partners.

Last verified April 22, 2026Seattle, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: NIST AI RMF
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 6 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeFiddler AIProtect AI
Founded20182022
HeadquartersPalo Alto, United StatesSeattle, United States
Employees51-20051-200
Funding$100M total (Series C, January 2026)Series B, $108.5M total raised ($14M seed Dec 2022, $35M Series A Jul 2023, $60M Series B Aug 2024) led by Evolution Equity Partners. Acquired by Palo Alto Networks, completed July 22, 2025.
PricingContact for pricingNow integrated into Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS. Original standalone Protect AI pricing was enterprise-only, contact sales. Current pricing through Palo Alto Networks.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkFiddler AIProtect AI
Colorado AI ActPartial
EU AI ActPartial
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001Partial
NIST AI RMFPartialPartial
NYC LL 144Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityFiddler AIProtect AI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

Protect AI

  • Defense & National Security
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector

Integrations

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Weights & Biases
  • Okta
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

Protect AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Databricks

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and Protect AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.