Fiddler AI vs TrojAI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-trojai

Fiddler AI

AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.

Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.

Last verified April 21, 2026Palo Alto, United States

TrojAI

Deploy AI Agents with Confidence.

TrojAI is a Saint John, New Brunswick-based AI security company founded in 2019 by James Stewart and Stephen Goddard. The company provides an enterprise AI security platform with two core products: TrojAI Detect (pre-deployment model red teaming and vulnerability assessment) and TrojAI Defend (runtime AI firewall for AI applications and agents). In 2025, TrojAI extended Defend to cover MCP (Model Context Protocol) server governance, providing visibility and policy enforcement for agentic AI workflows. TrojAI serves primarily large enterprise customers in financial services and technology, helping them align with NIST, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and CSA frameworks. The company participated in Google's 2023 accelerator program for Canadian startups and was listed on the Vector Institute's '20 Canadian AI Startups to Watch.' TrojAI raised $5.75M in seed capital in April 2024 and maintains offices in Saint John, Fredericton, and Boston.

Last verified April 22, 2026Saint John, Canada

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 8 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeFiddler AITrojAI
Founded20182019
HeadquartersPalo Alto, United StatesSaint John, Canada
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$100M total (Series C, January 2026)Seed, $5.75M raised (April 2024), led by Flying Fish with participation from Build Ventures, Techstars, Alteryx Ventures, and Flybridge Capital Partners. Prior seed of $3M (2022). Total raised approximately $8M.
PricingContact for pricingEnterprise-only, no public pricing. Contact sales at troj.ai.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkFiddler AITrojAI
Colorado AI ActPartial
EU AI ActPartialPartial
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001Partial
NIST AI RMFPartialPartial
NYC LL 144Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityFiddler AITrojAI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

TrojAI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Defense & National Security

Integrations

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Weights & Biases
  • Okta
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

TrojAI

  • OpenAI API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and TrojAI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.