Fiddler AI vs TrojAI
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-trojaiFiddler AI
AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.
Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.
TrojAI
Deploy AI Agents with Confidence.
TrojAI is a Saint John, New Brunswick-based AI security company founded in 2019 by James Stewart and Stephen Goddard. The company provides an enterprise AI security platform with two core products: TrojAI Detect (pre-deployment model red teaming and vulnerability assessment) and TrojAI Defend (runtime AI firewall for AI applications and agents). In 2025, TrojAI extended Defend to cover MCP (Model Context Protocol) server governance, providing visibility and policy enforcement for agentic AI workflows. TrojAI serves primarily large enterprise customers in financial services and technology, helping them align with NIST, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and CSA frameworks. The company participated in Google's 2023 accelerator program for Canadian startups and was listed on the Vector Institute's '20 Canadian AI Startups to Watch.' TrojAI raised $5.75M in seed capital in April 2024 and maintains offices in Saint John, Fredericton, and Boston.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
- Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC LL 144
- Shared capabilities: 8 of 9 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Fiddler AI | TrojAI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Saint John, Canada |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $100M total (Series C, January 2026) | Seed, $5.75M raised (April 2024), led by Flying Fish with participation from Build Ventures, Techstars, Alteryx Ventures, and Flybridge Capital Partners. Prior seed of $3M (2022). Total raised approximately $8M. |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Enterprise-only, no public pricing. Contact sales at troj.ai. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Fiddler AI | TrojAI |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Partial | — |
| EU AI Act | Partial | Partial |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | — |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Partial | — |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | Partial | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Fiddler AI | TrojAI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | — |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Fiddler AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Retail & E-commerce
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
TrojAI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Defense & National Security
Integrations
Fiddler AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- Weights & Biases
- Okta
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
TrojAI
- OpenAI API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and TrojAI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.