Galileo vs WhyLabs
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/galileo-ai-vs-whylabsGalileo
Don't just monitor AI failures. Stop them.
Galileo is an AI observability and evaluation engineering platform that helps enterprise teams evaluate, monitor, and protect generative AI applications and agents at scale. Its Agent Reliability platform enables teams to build ground-truth datasets, auto-tune evaluation metrics from live feedback, distill LLM-as-a-Judge evaluators into compact Luna models for production guardrails, and run the full eval engineering lifecycle from offline testing to production monitoring. The platform is trusted by teams at HP, Comcast, and Twilio, and is deployable as SaaS, VPC, or on-premises.
WhyLabs
The AI Observability Platform
WhyLabs provided an AI observability platform for monitoring machine learning models, data pipelines, and generative AI applications in real-time. Key differentiators included privacy-preserving data logging via open-source whylogs, LLM monitoring with langkit, drift detection, and low-latency threat detection without data movement. Targeted ML engineers and data scientists at Fortune 100 companies to AI startups in regulated sectors like financial-services and healthcare. Company discontinued commercial operations in 2025 following reported acquisition by Apple, open-sourcing its platform; tools remain available on GitHub.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
- Only WhyLabs covers: SOC 2
- Shared capabilities: 3 of 12 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Galileo | WhyLabs |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Burlingame, USA | Seattle, US |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $68M total; most recent: $45M Series B led by Scale Venture Partners (October 2024) | $14M total (Series A, 2021) |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Galileo | WhyLabs |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | — | Certified |
Capabilities
| Capability | Galileo | WhyLabs |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Agent Tracing | ✓ | — |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | — |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | — | ✓ |
| Drift Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hallucination Detection | ✓ | — |
| LLM Evaluation | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | — | ✓ |
| LLM Observability | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt Management | ✓ | — |
Industries served
Galileo
- None listed
WhyLabs
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Retail & E-commerce
- Manufacturing
Integrations
Galileo
- None listed
WhyLabs
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- scikit-learn
- Apache Spark
- Ray
- OpenAI API
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Galileo and WhyLabs?+
Galileo is Don't just monitor AI failures. Stop them; WhyLabs is The AI Observability Platform. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (0 shared, 0 unique to Galileo, 1 unique to WhyLabs), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do Galileo and WhyLabs pricing compare?+
Galileo: Free tier: $0/month, 5,000 traces/month, unlimited users and custom evals. Pro: $100/month (billed yearly saves 33%), 50,000 traces/month, standard RBAC, Slack support. Enterprise: contact for pricing, unlimited traces, VPC/on-prem deploy, real-time guardrails, 24/7 support. WhyLabs: Free tier for 1 model; $100/month for 2 models, scaling per model up to enterprise at $8,333/month (AWS Marketplace listing).
Which AI compliance frameworks do Galileo and WhyLabs both support?+
There is no published overlap in framework coverage between Galileo and WhyLabs based on each vendor's own materials.
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Galileo and WhyLabs and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Related
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.