Holistic AI vs Weights & Biases Weave

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/holistic-ai-vs-wb-weave

Holistic AI

End-to-end AI governance built on UCL-grounded research.

Holistic AI is an enterprise AI governance platform founded in 2020 and spun out of University College London by Dr. Adriano Koshiyama and Dr. Emre Kazim. Headquartered in London with a US presence, Holistic AI provides model discovery, risk assessment, bias and robustness testing, and continuous monitoring across an organization's AI portfolio — including agents, LLMs, and classic ML. The company has built a strong research footprint in algorithmic auditing.

Last verified April 21, 2026London, United Kingdom

Weights & Biases Weave

Deliver AI with confidence.

Weights & Biases (W&B) is a San Francisco-based MLOps and LLMOps platform founded in 2017. Weave is W&B's product layer purpose-built for LLM observability, evaluation, and governance. It provides automatic tracing of LLM calls (inputs, outputs, latency, cost), evaluation pipelines with human and automated scoring, dataset versioning, and guardrails to block prompt attacks and harmful outputs. Weave integrates with major LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and frameworks such as LangChain and LlamaIndex. For AI compliance, W&B runs EU AI Act-focused webinar series demonstrating how Weave can generate compliance dossiers for high-risk AI systems, providing audit trails and evidence generation. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Enterprise tier includes SSO, RBAC, and private cloud deployment. W&B has raised $305M total and was valued at $1.25B in 2023.

Last verified April 22, 2026San Francisco, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Holistic AI covers: Colorado AI Act, EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, NYC LL 144, UK AI Framework
  • Shared capabilities: 4 of 10 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeHolistic AIWeights & Biases Weave
Founded20202017
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomSan Francisco, United States
Employees51-200201-500
FundingSeed + Series A (undisclosed)Multi-round, $305M total raised across 6 rounds. Most recent: $50M equity round (August 2023) led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman at $1.25B valuation.
PricingEnterprise-only with modular pricing by use case.Free tier available for individuals. Team tier at published per-seat pricing. Enterprise tier (SSO, RBAC, private cloud) is contact sales. See https://wandb.ai/site/pricing for current tiers.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkHolistic AIWeights & Biases Weave
Colorado AI ActFull
EU AI ActFull
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001Full
NIST AI RMFFull
NYC LL 144Full
UK AI FrameworkPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityHolistic AIWeights & Biases Weave
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Holistic AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Employment & HR
  • SaaS & Technology

Weights & Biases Weave

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Holistic AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • GitHub
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • ServiceNow

Weights & Biases Weave

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Weights & Biases

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Holistic AI and Weights & Biases Weave and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.