Patronus AI vs Robust Intelligence

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/patronus-ai-vs-robust-intelligence

Patronus AI

Industry-first automated evaluation and security platform for LLMs.

Patronus AI provides an automated platform for evaluating and securing large language models (LLMs), enabling enterprise teams to score performance, generate adversarial test cases, benchmark models, detect hallucinations, PII leakage, and other failure modes across 50+ categories. Key differentiators include proprietary evaluator models like Lynx for hallucination detection outperforming GPT-4o, domain-specific benchmarks such as FinanceBench and EnterprisePII, and agent tracing for 15 error modes. Typical buyers are AI engineers and enterprises like Etsy, Pearson, AngelList in saas-technology and financial-services deploying production AI systems. Raised $20M total funding, with $17M Series A in 2024.

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

Robust Intelligence

Robust Intelligence was a San Francisco-based AI security company co-founded in 2019 by Harvard computer science professor Yaron Singer and Kojin Oshiba. The company pioneered the concept of an 'AI Firewall' — a purpose-built platform that validates, stress-tests, and protects AI models from development through production. Key capabilities included algorithmic red teaming, automated model assessment, and proactive AI risk mitigation aligned to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS standards. Robust Intelligence was acquired by Cisco in October 2024 for a reported $400M and has been foundational to the development of Cisco AI Defense and Cisco Foundation AI. Its technology is now integrated into the Cisco Security Cloud, providing threat protection against prompt injection, data poisoning, jailbreaking, and unintentional model outcomes. The company raised $44M prior to acquisition across three rounds.

Last verified April 22, 2026San Francisco, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Robust Intelligence covers: NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributePatronus AIRobust Intelligence
Founded20232019
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USSan Francisco, United States
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$20M total (Series A, May 2024)Pre-acquisition total: $44M raised ($3M seed Mar 2019 led by Engineering Capital/Sequoia, $11-14M Series A 2020 led by Sequoia Capital, $30M Series B Dec 2021 led by Tiger Global). Acquired by Cisco, completed October 2024 (reported ~$400M).
PricingContact for pricingNow integrated into Cisco AI Defense / Cisco Security Cloud. Standalone Robust Intelligence is no longer sold independently. Pricing through Cisco.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkPatronus AIRobust Intelligence
NIST AI RMFFull

Capabilities

CapabilityPatronus AIRobust Intelligence
AI Model Inventory
Agent Tracing
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Patronus AI

  • Financial Services
  • SaaS & Technology

Robust Intelligence

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

Integrations

Patronus AI

  • Hugging Face
  • NVIDIA
  • MongoDB
  • Databricks
  • OpenAI API

Robust Intelligence

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • GitHub
  • OpenAI API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Patronus AI and Robust Intelligence and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.