AI Compliance Vendors

Galileo vs Weights & Biases Weave

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked October 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/galileo-ai-vs-wb-weave

Galileo

Evaluation, observability and guardrails for LLM apps and AI agents; acquired by Cisco in 2026 and now sold as Splunk Agent Observability

Galileo is an evaluation, observability and guardrails platform for generative AI applications and AI agents. It has been owned by Cisco since May 2026: Cisco announced its intent to acquire Galileo Technologies, Inc. on April 9, 2026, and said on May 22, 2026 that the acquisition was complete. Terms weren't disclosed. Galileo is now part of Splunk, a Cisco company, and its documentation says that as of August 7, 2026 "Galileo is now Splunk Agent Observability." Customers who onboarded before that date use Galileo's documentation; later customers use Splunk's. galileo.ai's pricing page now redirects to Splunk's pricing page. Galileo was founded in 2021 by Vikram Chatterji (CEO), formerly of Google AI, Atindriyo Sanyal, formerly of Apple and Uber AI, and Yash Sheth, formerly of Google, and was based in San Francisco. Before the acquisition it raised $68 million, most recently a $45 million Series B led by Scale Venture Partners in October 2024; it then said six Fortune 50 companies, including Comcast and Twilio, were customers. The platform logs traces and spans from agent frameworks (LangChain and LangGraph, CrewAI, the OpenAI Agents SDK, Strands Agents, the Vercel AI SDK, and any OpenTelemetry or OpenInference source) and scores them with metrics such as context adherence, correctness, tool selection quality, action completion, toxicity, PII, prompt injection and sexism/bias. Many metrics run on Luna-2, Galileo's small evaluation models, which require an enterprise plan; Galileo says they cut production monitoring costs by up to 97% with latency under 200 ms. Signals (January 2026) detects failure patterns across production traces and can turn them into custom metrics. Agent Control, an open-source (Apache 2.0) control plane released in March 2026, applies central policies to agents (deny, steer, warn, log or allow) using Luna, NVIDIA NeMo, Amazon Bedrock or custom evaluators. It replaced Galileo's older Protect guardrails, which were deprecated in June 2026. Under Splunk, Galileo's technology is being added to the AI Agent Monitoring feature of Splunk Observability. In June 2026 Splunk described Splunk Agent Observability as a new on-premises offering powered by Galileo; in October 2026 it said the product had started rolling out in September 2026 on premises, in Cisco Cloud Control and in Splunk Observability Cloud, and its pricing page lists it for Observability Cloud and self-hosted deployments. **AI compliance coverage** Galileo doesn't document support for the EU AI Act, the NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001. Its trust page says it has a SOC 2 Type II report, provides HIPAA-compliant infrastructure and can sign business associate agreements (BAAs). What it offers a compliance program is evidence of how models and agents behave (evaluation scores, traces and guardrail decisions), not framework controls or an AI inventory. **Who it's for** Engineering teams building LLM applications and agents that want evaluation, production monitoring and runtime guardrails in one tool. New customers now buy through Splunk, so it fits Splunk Observability customers most naturally.

Last checked October 15, 2026San Francisco, United States

Weights & Biases Weave

Deliver AI with confidence.

Weights & Biases (W&B) is a San Francisco-based MLOps and LLMOps platform founded in 2017. Weave is W&B's product layer purpose-built for LLM observability, evaluation, and governance. It provides automatic tracing of LLM calls (inputs, outputs, latency, cost), evaluation pipelines with human and automated scoring, dataset versioning, and guardrails to block prompt attacks and harmful outputs. Weave integrates with major LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and frameworks such as LangChain and LlamaIndex. For AI compliance, W&B runs EU AI Act-focused webinar series demonstrating how Weave can generate compliance dossiers for high-risk AI systems, providing audit trails and evidence generation. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Enterprise tier includes SSO, RBAC, and private cloud deployment. W&B has raised $305M total and was valued at $1.25B in 2023.

Last checked October 15, 2026San Francisco, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Galileo covers: HIPAA, SOC 2
  • Shared capabilities: 0 of 13 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeGalileoWeights & Biases Weave
Founded20212017
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesSan Francisco, United States
EmployeesUndisclosed201-500
FundingAcquired by Cisco (announced April 2026, completed May 2026; terms not disclosed). Raised $68M before the acquisition; last round a $45M Series B led by Scale Venture Partners (October 2024)Multi-round, $305M total raised across 6 rounds. Most recent: $50M equity round (August 2023) led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman at $1.25B valuation.
PricingSold as Splunk Agent Observability: Splunk lists it "starting at just $100 per month per 1.2 million spans annually, billed annually", including 500 million Luna tokens and 5 Luna fine-tuning runs a year; a free edition is linked. Galileo's own Free and Pro plans are no longer published (galileo.ai/pricing redirects to Splunk).Free tier available for individuals. Team tier at published per-seat pricing. Enterprise tier (SSO, RBAC, private cloud) is contact sales. See https://wandb.ai/site/pricing for current tiers.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkGalileoWeights & Biases Weave
HIPAAlimited—
SOC 2Certified—

Capabilities

CapabilityGalileoWeights & Biases Weave
AI Model Inventory—✓
Agent Tracing✓—
Audit Evidence Collection—✓
Data Leakage Prevention✓—
Explainability—✓
Hallucination Detection✓—
LLM Evaluation✓—
LLM Guardrails✓—
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering—✓
LLM Observability✓—
Model Monitoring—✓
Policy Enforcement✓—
Prompt Injection Defense✓—

Industries served

Galileo

  • None listed

Weights & Biases Weave

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Galileo

  • LangChain
  • CrewAI
  • Vercel AI SDK
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • OpenTelemetry

Weights & Biases Weave

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Weights & Biases

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Galileo and Weights & Biases Weave?+

Galileo is Evaluation, observability and guardrails for LLM apps and AI agents; acquired by Cisco in 2026 and now sold as Splunk Agent Observability; Weights & Biases Weave is Deliver AI with confidence. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (0 shared, 2 unique to Galileo, 0 unique to Weights & Biases Weave), pricing model, and capability overlap.

How do Galileo and Weights & Biases Weave pricing compare?+

Galileo: Sold as Splunk Agent Observability: Splunk lists it "starting at just $100 per month per 1.2 million spans annually, billed annually", including 500 million Luna tokens and 5 Luna fine-tuning runs a year; a free edition is linked. Galileo's own Free and Pro plans are no longer published (galileo.ai/pricing redirects to Splunk). Weights & Biases Weave: Free tier available for individuals. Team tier at published per-seat pricing. Enterprise tier (SSO, RBAC, private cloud) is contact sales. See https://wandb.ai/site/pricing for current tiers.

Which AI compliance frameworks do Galileo and Weights & Biases Weave both support?+

There is no published overlap in framework coverage between Galileo and Weights & Biases Weave based on each vendor's own materials.

Related

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.