Arthur vs Robust Intelligence
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/arthur-vs-robust-intelligenceArthur
Performance and safety for LLMs and classic ML.
Arthur is an AI performance and safety platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in New York City. The platform provides monitoring, explainability, and bias detection for production ML, plus Arthur Shield for LLM firewall and red-teaming. Arthur raised a $42M Series B in September 2022 led by Acrew Capital and Greycroft, bringing total funding to approximately $56M.
Robust Intelligence
Robust Intelligence was a San Francisco-based AI security company co-founded in 2019 by Harvard computer science professor Yaron Singer and Kojin Oshiba. The company pioneered the concept of an 'AI Firewall' — a purpose-built platform that validates, stress-tests, and protects AI models from development through production. Key capabilities included algorithmic red teaming, automated model assessment, and proactive AI risk mitigation aligned to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS standards. Robust Intelligence was acquired by Cisco in October 2024 for a reported $400M and has been foundational to the development of Cisco AI Defense and Cisco Foundation AI. Its technology is now integrated into the Cisco Security Cloud, providing threat protection against prompt injection, data poisoning, jailbreaking, and unintentional model outcomes. The company raised $44M prior to acquisition across three rounds.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: NIST AI RMF
- Only Arthur covers: EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22
- Shared capabilities: 6 of 10 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Arthur | Robust Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $56M total (Series B, September 2022) | Pre-acquisition total: $44M raised ($3M seed Mar 2019 led by Engineering Capital/Sequoia, $11-14M Series A 2020 led by Sequoia Capital, $30M Series B Dec 2021 led by Tiger Global). Acquired by Cisco, completed October 2024 (reported ~$400M). |
| Pricing | Shield has a free tier; enterprise monitoring is contact-only. | Now integrated into Cisco AI Defense / Cisco Security Cloud. Standalone Robust Intelligence is no longer sold independently. Pricing through Cisco. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Arthur | Robust Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | — |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | — |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Full |
Capabilities
| Capability | Arthur | Robust Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | — | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | — | ✓ |
Industries served
Arthur
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
Robust Intelligence
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
Integrations
Arthur
- AWS SageMaker
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- GitHub
Robust Intelligence
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- GitHub
- OpenAI API
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Arthur and Robust Intelligence and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.