AI Compliance Vendors

CalypsoAI vs ServiceNow AI Control Tower

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/calypsoai-vs-servicenow-ai-governance

CalypsoAI

Adaptive AI security platform securing models and applications at inference layer

CalypsoAI provides a full-lifecycle platform to secure AI models, applications, and agents at the inference layer against adversarial threats, data leaks, and compliance failures. The platform offers real-time threat defense, proactive red-teaming with agentic testing against thousands of attack prompts monthly, runtime guardrails for sensitive data and policy enforcement, and centralized observability with audit logs for regulatory needs. Targeted at enterprises deploying GenAI, it supports model-agnostic protection across SaaS, on-premises, and hybrid environments, enabling safe innovation without vendor lock-in. Acquired by F5 in 2025 for $180M, its capabilities integrate into F5's application delivery platform.F5 press release, Paladin press, homepage (279 words)

Last verified April 26, 2026Dublin, IE

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

Take control of any AI from a central intelligent hub — connect your AI strategy, governance, and management across the enterprise.

ServiceNow AI Control Tower is a centralized AI governance platform built on the ServiceNow AI Platform (CMDB and CSDM 5.0), enabling enterprises to discover, inventory, and govern AI assets across their entire ecosystem—including internally built, third-party, and agent-driven AI. The product provides automated AI asset discovery, risk and compliance management aligned to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act, lifecycle management, third-party AI risk assessment, and integration with ServiceNow's Integrated Risk Management (IRM) and IT Service Management (ITSM) modules. ServiceNow has signed the EU AI Code of Practice.

Last verified April 26, 2026Santa Clara, USA

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA
  • Only ServiceNow AI Control Tower covers: FedRAMP, NIST AI RMF, PCI DSS
  • Shared capabilities: 2 of 16 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeCalypsoAIServiceNow AI Control Tower
Founded20182004
HeadquartersDublin, IESanta Clara, USA
Employees51-2001000+
Funding$40M+ venture funding; Series A $13M (2020, Paladin-led), $23M (2023, Paladin-led), Crosspoint (2025); acquired by F5 for $180M (2025)Undisclosed
PricingEnterprise licensing; contact sales for quote, depending on deployment (SaaS/on-prem/hybrid) and plan.Contact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkCalypsoAIServiceNow AI Control Tower
EU AI ActPartialPartial
FedRAMPCertified
GDPR Art. 22PartialPartial
HIPAAPartialPartial
NIST AI RMFPartial
PCI DSSCertified

Capabilities

CapabilityCalypsoAIServiceNow AI Control Tower
AI Incident Response
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Audit Logging
Hallucination Detection
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Observability
LLM Red Teaming
Policy Management
Prompt Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Risk Management
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

CalypsoAI

  • Government & Public Sector
  • Defense & National Security

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

  • None listed

Integrations

CalypsoAI

  • None listed

ServiceNow AI Control Tower

  • None listed

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to CalypsoAI and ServiceNow AI Control Tower and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.