CalypsoAI vs ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/calypsoai-vs-servicenow-ai-governanceCalypsoAI
Adaptive AI security platform securing models and applications at inference layer
CalypsoAI provides a full-lifecycle platform to secure AI models, applications, and agents at the inference layer against adversarial threats, data leaks, and compliance failures. The platform offers real-time threat defense, proactive red-teaming with agentic testing against thousands of attack prompts monthly, runtime guardrails for sensitive data and policy enforcement, and centralized observability with audit logs for regulatory needs. Targeted at enterprises deploying GenAI, it supports model-agnostic protection across SaaS, on-premises, and hybrid environments, enabling safe innovation without vendor lock-in. Acquired by F5 in 2025 for $180M, its capabilities integrate into F5's application delivery platform.F5 press release, Paladin press, homepage (279 words)
ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Take control of any AI from a central intelligent hub — connect your AI strategy, governance, and management across the enterprise.
ServiceNow AI Control Tower is a centralized AI governance platform built on the ServiceNow AI Platform (CMDB and CSDM 5.0), enabling enterprises to discover, inventory, and govern AI assets across their entire ecosystem—including internally built, third-party, and agent-driven AI. The product provides automated AI asset discovery, risk and compliance management aligned to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act, lifecycle management, third-party AI risk assessment, and integration with ServiceNow's Integrated Risk Management (IRM) and IT Service Management (ITSM) modules. ServiceNow has signed the EU AI Code of Practice.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA
- Only ServiceNow AI Control Tower covers: FedRAMP, NIST AI RMF, PCI DSS
- Shared capabilities: 2 of 16 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | CalypsoAI | ServiceNow AI Control Tower |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Dublin, IE | Santa Clara, USA |
| Employees | 51-200 | 1000+ |
| Funding | $40M+ venture funding; Series A $13M (2020, Paladin-led), $23M (2023, Paladin-led), Crosspoint (2025); acquired by F5 for $180M (2025) | Undisclosed |
| Pricing | Enterprise licensing; contact sales for quote, depending on deployment (SaaS/on-prem/hybrid) and plan. | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | CalypsoAI | ServiceNow AI Control Tower |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | Partial |
| FedRAMP | — | Certified |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | Partial |
| HIPAA | Partial | Partial |
| NIST AI RMF | — | Partial |
| PCI DSS | — | Certified |
Capabilities
| Capability | CalypsoAI | ServiceNow AI Control Tower |
|---|---|---|
| AI Incident Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | — | ✓ |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hallucination Detection | ✓ | — |
| LLM Evaluation | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | — |
| LLM Observability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | — | ✓ |
| Prompt Management | ✓ | — |
| Regulatory Intelligence | — | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | — | ✓ |
Industries served
CalypsoAI
- Government & Public Sector
- Defense & National Security
ServiceNow AI Control Tower
- None listed
Integrations
CalypsoAI
- None listed
ServiceNow AI Control Tower
- None listed
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to CalypsoAI and ServiceNow AI Control Tower and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.