Galileo vs Langfuse
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/galileo-ai-vs-langfuseGalileo
Don't just monitor AI failures. Stop them.
Galileo is an AI observability and evaluation engineering platform that helps enterprise teams evaluate, monitor, and protect generative AI applications and agents at scale. Its Agent Reliability platform enables teams to build ground-truth datasets, auto-tune evaluation metrics from live feedback, distill LLM-as-a-Judge evaluators into compact Luna models for production guardrails, and run the full eval engineering lifecycle from offline testing to production monitoring. The platform is trusted by teams at HP, Comcast, and Twilio, and is deployable as SaaS, VPC, or on-premises.
Langfuse
Open Source LLM Engineering Platform
Langfuse is an open-source LLM observability platform that provides tracing, evaluations, prompt management, and analytics for debugging and improving LLM applications and agents. Key differentiators include model/framework-agnostic SDKs, OpenTelemetry compatibility, self-hosting option, and integrated workflow for observability, experiments, and human annotation. Typical buyers are AI engineering teams at startups to Fortune 50 companies developing production AI products. Notable: Acquired by ClickHouse in January 2026; supports compliance certifications like SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA eligible.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 9 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Galileo | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Burlingame, USA | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $68M total; most recent: $45M Series B led by Scale Venture Partners (October 2024) | $4M total (Seed, November 2023) |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Galileo | Langfuse |
|---|
Capabilities
| Capability | Galileo | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | — |
| Drift Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hallucination Detection | ✓ | — |
| LLM Evaluation | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| LLM Observability | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Galileo
- None listed
Langfuse
- None listed
Integrations
Galileo
- None listed
Langfuse
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- LangChain
- LlamaIndex
- Vercel AI SDK
- LiteLLM
- CrewAI
- Amazon Bedrock
- Azure OpenAI Service
- Mistral AI
- Groq
- GitHub
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Galileo and Langfuse?+
Galileo is Don't just monitor AI failures. Stop them; Langfuse is Open Source LLM Engineering Platform. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (0 shared, 0 unique to Galileo, 0 unique to Langfuse), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do Galileo and Langfuse pricing compare?+
Galileo: Free tier: $0/month, 5,000 traces/month, unlimited users and custom evals. Pro: $100/month (billed yearly saves 33%), 50,000 traces/month, standard RBAC, Slack support. Enterprise: contact for pricing, unlimited traces, VPC/on-prem deploy, real-time guardrails, 24/7 support. Langfuse: Hobby free forever; Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, Enterprise $2499/mo; all include 100k units/mo (50k for Hobby), additional usage $8/100k units decreasing with volume; discounts for startups/OSS/EDU.
Which AI compliance frameworks do Galileo and Langfuse both support?+
There is no published overlap in framework coverage between Galileo and Langfuse based on each vendor's own materials.
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Galileo and Langfuse and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Related
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.