AI Compliance Vendors

Langfuse vs LangSmith

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified April 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/langfuse-vs-langsmith

The verdict

Both Langfuse and LangSmith are LLM observability platforms purpose-built for engineering teams running agents and chains in production: tracing, evals, prompt management, and cost / latency monitoring. The decision usually comes down to data control and ecosystem fit. Langfuse is MIT-licensed open source with a free, self-hostable container plus a managed cloud, and publishes SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA eligibility for the cloud. LangSmith is closed-source SaaS from LangChain, Inc. with a BYOC / self-hosted option on enterprise plans. Neither vendor currently publishes a dedicated EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF solution page; both can support those workflows operationally (audit trails, eval logs, dataset lineage), but mapping to controls is on the buyer.

Choose Langfuse if…

You want open source under MIT with a credible self-hosted path, your data must stay in your VPC or on-prem, you already use frameworks beyond LangChain (CrewAI, LiteLLM, Mistral, Bedrock), or you need flat-rate pricing — Langfuse Cloud is $29 / $199 / $2,499 per month with 50k–100k units included, plus usage. Langfuse also publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA-eligible status for the managed cloud.

Choose LangSmith if…

You are committed to the LangChain ecosystem, want first-party support for LangGraph and LangChain agents, prefer SaaS billing with included quotas (Plus includes 10k base traces per month and unlimited seats with usage-based overage at $2.50 per 1k base traces), and value the closer integration with LangChain Hub, prompts, and deployments. Hybrid and self-hosted options that keep data in your VPC are available on the Enterprise plan.

At a glance

AttributeLangfuseLangSmith
Founded20232023
HeadquartersBerlin, GermanySan Francisco, US
Employees11-5051-200
Funding$4M total (Seed, November 2023)$160M total (Series B, Oct 2025)
PricingContact for pricingContact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkLangfuseLangSmith

Capabilities

CapabilityLangfuseLangSmith
Agent Tracing
Drift Detection
LLM Evaluation
Model Monitoring
Prompt Management

Industries served

Langfuse

  • None listed

LangSmith

  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Langfuse

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • LangChain
  • LlamaIndex
  • Vercel AI SDK
  • LiteLLM
  • CrewAI
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Azure OpenAI Service
  • Mistral AI
  • Groq
  • GitHub

LangSmith

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • OpenTelemetry
  • LlamaIndex

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Langfuse and LangSmith?+

Langfuse is Open Source LLM Engineering Platform; LangSmith is AI Agent & LLM Observability Platform. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (0 shared, 0 unique to Langfuse, 0 unique to LangSmith), pricing model, and capability overlap.

How do Langfuse and LangSmith pricing compare?+

Langfuse: Hobby free forever; Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, Enterprise $2499/mo; all include 100k units/mo (50k for Hobby), additional usage $8/100k units decreasing with volume; discounts for startups/OSS/EDU. LangSmith: Developer free (1 seat, 5k base traces/mo); Plus $39/seat/mo (unlimited seats, 10k base traces/mo); traces $2.50/1k base (14d), $5/1k extended (400d); Enterprise custom with self-hosting.Pricing page

Which AI compliance frameworks do Langfuse and LangSmith both support?+

There is no published overlap in framework coverage between Langfuse and LangSmith based on each vendor's own materials.

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Langfuse and LangSmith and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Related

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.