Patronus AI vs Prompt Security

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/patronus-ai-vs-prompt-security

Patronus AI

Industry-first automated evaluation and security platform for LLMs.

Patronus AI provides an automated platform for evaluating and securing large language models (LLMs), enabling enterprise teams to score performance, generate adversarial test cases, benchmark models, detect hallucinations, PII leakage, and other failure modes across 50+ categories. Key differentiators include proprietary evaluator models like Lynx for hallucination detection outperforming GPT-4o, domain-specific benchmarks such as FinanceBench and EnterprisePII, and agent tracing for 15 error modes. Typical buyers are AI engineers and enterprises like Etsy, Pearson, AngelList in saas-technology and financial-services deploying production AI systems. Raised $20M total funding, with $17M Series A in 2024.

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

Prompt Security

Prompt Security is the AI security company helping you manage GenAI risks.

Prompt Security is a Tel Aviv-based AI security company founded in August 2023 by Itamar Golan (CEO) and Lior Drihem (CTO), both alumni of Israel's elite Unit 8200 with prior experience at Check Point and Orca Security. The company provides an enterprise platform for securing all generative AI interactions — covering employee AI tool usage (shadow AI discovery, data protection), homegrown AI applications (prompt injection defense, output filtering), AI code assistants, and agentic AI security including MCP gateway protection. Prompt Security is a core contributor to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications. The company raised $23M prior to its acquisition by SentinelOne, which was completed on September 5, 2025. Prompt Security continues to operate as a standalone platform and product brand within SentinelOne's Singularity platform. CRN named it a 2025 Stellar Startup in Security.

Last verified April 22, 2026Tel Aviv, Israel

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Prompt Security covers: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 12 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributePatronus AIPrompt Security
Founded20232023
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USTel Aviv, Israel
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$20M total (Series A, May 2024)Series A, $23M total raised ($5M seed 2023, $18M Series A Nov 2024 led by Jump Capital). Acquired by SentinelOne, completed September 5, 2025 for approximately $180–$250M in cash and stock.
PricingContact for pricingNow part of SentinelOne Singularity Platform. Continues as a standalone product. Enterprise pricing only; contact sales or SentinelOne.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkPatronus AIPrompt Security
EU AI ActFull
ISO/IEC 42001Full
NIST AI RMFPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityPatronus AIPrompt Security
AI Model Inventory
Agent Tracing
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Patronus AI

  • Financial Services
  • SaaS & Technology

Prompt Security

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Employment & HR
  • Education
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Retail & E-commerce

Integrations

Patronus AI

  • Hugging Face
  • NVIDIA
  • MongoDB
  • Databricks
  • OpenAI API

Prompt Security

  • Okta
  • Slack
  • OpenAI API
  • GitHub
  • Azure Entra ID
  • Jira
  • Anthropic API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Patronus AI and Prompt Security and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.