AI Compliance Vendors

Aporia vs Fiddler AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked April 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/aporia-vs-fiddler-ai

Aporia

Deliver secure and reliable AI

Aporia is an AI observability and guardrails platform that enables organizations to monitor, secure, and govern AI and machine learning models in production. The platform provides real-time detection and mitigation of risks such as hallucinations, prompt injections, data leakage, bias, drift, and security vulnerabilities using a multiSLM detection engine for low-latency, high-accuracy protection. It supports multimodal AI including text, audio, and vision, with customizable policies, real-time streaming validation, and seamless integration into existing AI workflows. Observability features offer visibility into model performance, session exploration, and policy effectiveness. Aporia serves enterprises from startups to Fortune 500 companies like Lemonade, DoorDash, MunichRe, and Bosch, focusing on responsible AI deployment through security, reliability, and governance controls. Enterprise-grade security includes HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR compliance, and private deployments. Founded in 2019 and acquired by Coralogix in December 2024, Aporia's technology now enhances Coralogix's observability offerings for unified monitoring of AI alongside traditional infrastructure.

Last checked April 27, 2026San Jose, United States

Fiddler AI

Observability, evaluation and guardrails for predictive models and LLM agents, with guardrails that run inside your own cloud

Fiddler AI is an observability, evaluation and guardrails platform that now calls itself "the control plane for enterprise AI agents." It was founded in October 2018 by Krishna Gade (CEO), formerly an engineering manager at Facebook, and Amit Paka (COO), and is based in Palo Alto, California. It has raised $100 million; its latest round was a $30 million Series C led by RPS Ventures in January 2026, with Lightspeed Venture Partners, Lux Capital and Insight Partners among the existing investors taking part. Fiddler says its revenue grew more than fourfold in the 18 months before that round. Customers shown on its site include Nielsen, Integral Ad Science, Qualtrics, Thumbtack, LendingPoint, American Family Insurance and the US Department of Energy. The platform covers two kinds of AI. For predictive models, ML Observability tracks performance, drift and data integrity with root-cause analysis, gives global and local explanations, and runs fairness checks such as disparate impact, equal opportunity and demographic parity on structured, text and image models. For LLM applications and agents, it ingests OpenTelemetry traces (with integrations for LangGraph, LangChain, Strands Agents, Google ADK, Claude Code and LiteLLM), scores them with 80+ built-in metrics, custom evaluators or your own LLM judge, and runs experiments against golden datasets. Its Guardrails, powered by Fiddler's own Centor models, screen prompts and responses for hallucinations (faithfulness), toxicity, jailbreaks, prompt injection and 35+ types of PII and PHI. Fiddler says enforcement takes under 80 ms and runs inside the customer's cloud or VPC with no data leaving it. Deployment options are SaaS, VPC, AWS GovCloud and on-premises. **AI compliance coverage** Fiddler's governance features are audit trails that record every decision, action, evaluation and policy outcome, plus executive dashboards. Its governance page names SR 11-7, HIPAA and NAIC, and lists the EU AI Act among relevant policies; its Control Plane FAQ says its audit trails support the NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, HIPAA, SR 11-7, NAIC and the EU AI Act. It doesn't publish control mappings, templates or a model inventory for any of them. Fiddler says it has a SOC 2 Type II report and is HIPAA compliant. In 2023 it released Fiddler Auditor, a free LLM red-teaming and robustness library under the Elastic License 2.0, but its last release was in November 2023 and red-teaming isn't part of the current platform. **Who it's for** Enterprises in financial services, insurance, healthcare and government that run predictive models and LLM agents in production and want monitoring, evaluation and runtime guardrails in one place, often inside their own cloud. It is an observability and enforcement layer, not a governance workflow tool: teams that need AI inventories, risk assessments and policy workflows will need a governance platform alongside it.

Last checked October 15, 2026Palo Alto, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: SOC 2
  • Only Aporia covers: GDPR Art. 22
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: EU AI Act, HIPAA, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 6 of 14 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeAporiaFiddler AI
Founded20192018
HeadquartersSan Jose, United StatesPalo Alto, United States
Employees51-200Undisclosed
FundingSeries A, $25M, 2022-02$100M total; latest round a $30M Series C led by RPS Ventures (January 2026)
PricingEnterprise pricing only. Not publicly listed.Three plans: Free (real-time guardrails for hallucinations, toxicity, PII/PHI, prompt injection and jailbreaks, powered by Fiddler's Centor models); Developer at $0.002 per trace (adds unified observability with tests and experiments for agentic and predictive systems, custom evaluators and bring-your-own judge, role-based access control and SSO; SaaS only); and Enterprise, priced by sales (adds enterprise-grade guardrails and scale, SaaS, VPC or on-premises deployment, and a named customer success manager). The pricing page lists no trace or user limits.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkAporiaFiddler AI
EU AI Act—limited
GDPR Art. 22Comprehensive—
HIPAA—Partial
ISO/IEC 42001—Adjacent
NIST AI RMF—Adjacent
SOC 2ComprehensiveCertified

Capabilities

CapabilityAporiaFiddler AI
AI Guardrails✓—
Agent Tracing—✓
Audit Logging—✓
Bias & Fairness Testing✓✓
Data Leakage Prevention✓✓
Drift Detection✓✓
Explainability—✓
Hallucination Detection✓✓
LLM Evaluation—✓
LLM Guardrails—✓
LLM Observability—✓
Model Monitoring✓✓
Policy Enforcement—✓
Prompt Injection Defense✓✓

Industries served

Aporia

  • Financial Services
  • SaaS & Technology

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Insurance
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector

Integrations

Aporia

  • Google Vertex AI
  • Portkey
  • LiteLLM
  • Cloudflare
  • Google Cloud Marketplace
  • Microsoft Azure Marketplace

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Datadog
  • NVIDIA
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Azure OpenAI Service
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • LangChain
  • LiteLLM
  • OpenTelemetry
  • AWS GovCloud

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Aporia and Fiddler AI?+

Aporia is Deliver secure and reliable AI; Fiddler AI is Observability, evaluation and guardrails for predictive models and LLM agents, with guardrails that run inside your own cloud. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (1 shared, 1 unique to Aporia, 4 unique to Fiddler AI), pricing model, and capability overlap.

How do Aporia and Fiddler AI pricing compare?+

Aporia: Enterprise pricing only. Not publicly listed. Fiddler AI: Three plans: Free (real-time guardrails for hallucinations, toxicity, PII/PHI, prompt injection and jailbreaks, powered by Fiddler's Centor models); Developer at $0.002 per trace (adds unified observability with tests and experiments for agentic and predictive systems, custom evaluators and bring-your-own judge, role-based access control and SSO; SaaS only); and Enterprise, priced by sales (adds enterprise-grade guardrails and scale, SaaS, VPC or on-premises deployment, and a named customer success manager). The pricing page lis

Which AI compliance frameworks do Aporia and Fiddler AI both support?+

Both vendors document support for SOC 2. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.

Related

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.