AI Compliance Vendors

Cisco AI Defense vs Prediction Guard

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked October 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-vs-prediction-guard

Cisco AI Defense

Cisco's AI security product, built on Robust Intelligence: AI discovery, supply chain scanning, red teaming and runtime guardrails for apps and agents

Cisco AI Defense is Cisco's security product for enterprise AI applications, models and agents. Cisco unveiled it on January 15, 2025 and said it would be available that March. It is built on Robust Intelligence, the AI security startup Cisco announced it would acquire on August 26, 2024 and finished acquiring on September 24, 2024; Dark Reading called Robust Intelligence the core component of AI Defense. The product is sold by Cisco Systems, Inc., which was incorporated in 1984 and is based in San Jose; this profile lists Cisco's founding year and headquarters, as the directory does for other big-company products. Cisco's May 2026 data sheet splits the product into four parts. AI Cloud Visibility discovers AI models, applications, connected data sources, MCP servers and agents, including assets in Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex and Azure AI Foundry. AI Supply Chain Risk Management scans model files, repositories and MCP servers and tools, and gives each asset a risk score. AI Model and Application Validation runs algorithmic red teaming with more than 200 attack techniques and threat subcategories. AI Runtime Protection applies safety, security and privacy guardrails, enforces MCP policies at runtime and protects agent behavior. Runtime checks can run at the network level through Cisco Multicloud Defense, through a gateway, or through an Inspection API. Hybrid deployments (AWS EKS, Azure AKS, GCP and on-premises AI PODs on OpenShift) keep sensitive data in the customer's environment. A separate AI Access module, for employee use of third-party AI apps, comes through Cisco Secure Access and needs its Advantage package. **Agent and MCP security** In February 2026 Cisco added an AI bill of materials, an MCP Catalog, multi-turn red teaming of models and agents, real-time agentic guardrails and an integration with NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails; the release gave no availability dates. In March 2026 it launched AI Defense: Explorer Edition, a self-service red-teaming tool Cisco offers at no upfront cost, and announced an Agent Runtime SDK for Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, Google Vertex Agent Builder, Azure AI Foundry and LangChain, plus DefenseClaw, an open-source agent security framework. **Frameworks** Cisco says AI Defense has mapped to NIST, OWASP and MITRE frameworks since launch. Its data sheet names the NIST AI RMF, MITRE ATLAS and the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, and red-team reports also map to Cisco's own Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework. We found no documented support for the EU AI Act or ISO 42001. **Who it's for** Large enterprises that already use Cisco security products (Secure Access, Multicloud Defense, Splunk) and want AI discovery, red teaming and runtime guardrails from one vendor. Cisco doesn't publish prices.

Last checked October 15, 2026San Jose, United States

Prediction Guard

Self-hosted AI control plane that applies runtime policy controls to models, agents and MCP tools inside the customer's own infrastructure

Prediction Guard sells a self-hosted "sovereign AI control plane" for regulated organizations. It sits between applications and the models, agents and MCP tools they call, and applies access, safety and policy controls to each request inside the customer's own infrastructure. The company was founded in 2023 in Lafayette, Indiana; CEO Daniel Whitenack is a co-founder. It raised a $3.7 million seed round led by Sovereign Capital in May 2025, and Noblis Ventures made a strategic investment of undisclosed size in July 2025. At the time of the seed round it had eight employees and said it had 18 customers in health care, defense, transportation and manufacturing. The platform registers each agent with an identity and role and limits it to the models and tools that role needs. Runtime controls include PII masking, prompt injection detection, toxicity filtering, input sanitization, MCP tool scoping and human-in-the-loop approval; requests that fail a policy are blocked and logged. It produces an exportable AI bill of materials (CycloneDX) of models, guardrails and MCP servers, runs model security scans and streams security events to SIEM tools such as Splunk, Datadog and Grafana. Applications call it through OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible APIs. It deploys into a customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, on Kubernetes on premises, or air-gapped. Prediction Guard says its control overhead is under 200 ms per request. **AI compliance coverage** Prediction Guard says its policies align with the NIST AI RMF, NIST AI 600-1, the OWASP Top 10 for LLM and agentic applications, OMB M-26-04 and AIUC-1, with one-click baselines and an exportable "proof of alignment" for the NIST AI RMF. A company blog post (August 2026) adds the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001. The same post labels its OWASP mapping "self-published" and not independently verified, and notes that the audit log records enforcement events rather than full replayable traces. We found no published control-by-control mapping. The homepage shows badges for a SOC 2 Type 2 report by Sensiba and HIPAA compliance; there is no public trust center. **Who it's for** Regulated enterprises and public sector bodies that want AI guardrails and agent controls to run inside their own network, including disconnected environments. It is sold to government through Carahsoft. Its homepage quotes executives at Noblis (also an investor), SimWerx and iBase-t.

Last checked October 28, 2026Lafayette, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: NIST AI RMF
  • Only Prediction Guard covers: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 17 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeCisco AI DefensePrediction Guard
Founded19842023
HeadquartersSan Jose, United StatesLafayette, United States
EmployeesUndisclosedUndisclosed
FundingProduct of Cisco Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO); no separate funding$3.7M seed led by Sovereign Capital (May 2025), plus an undisclosed strategic investment from Noblis Ventures (July 2025)
PricingNo public prices. Cisco's AI Defense offer description (version 2.1, last modified September 23, 2026) names three packages: Advantage, Validation Essentials and Runtime Essentials; the data sheet shows supply chain scanning only in Advantage. Customers buy either per AI application or as committed usage: a prepaid balance drawn down by validation tests (600 in the first block, then 120 per block), runtime guardrails (measured in inspection tokens, in blocks of 1 billion), governed assets (blocks of 50) and endpoint agents. The runtime package assumes an aggregate limit of 10 million queries per AI application per year, and Enhanced Support is included. AWS Marketplace lists "Cisco AI Defense powered by Security Cloud Control" as SaaS with custom pricing by private offer. The Explorer Edition red-teaming tool is offered at no upfront cost.No prices on predictionguard.com. Its AWS Marketplace listing gives a 12-month bundled license at $165,000 covering two AI systems, 25 requests per second and unlimited monthly requests, with up to 10% off for 24 months. The Azure Marketplace listing describes a fixed-price offering that is never seat-based, with private offers on request.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkCisco AI DefensePrediction Guard
EU AI Act—limited
ISO/IEC 42001—limited
NIST AI RMFlimitedPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityCisco AI DefensePrediction Guard
AI Bill of Materials✓✓
AI Discovery✓—
AI Guardrails✓—
AI Supply Chain Risk✓✓
Agentic Red Teaming✓—
Audit Logging—✓
Data Leakage Prevention✓✓
Human-in-the-Loop—✓
LLM Guardrails—✓
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering—✓
LLM Red Teaming✓—
Model Validation✓—
Policy Enforcement—✓
Prompt Injection Defense✓✓
Risk Scoring✓—
Runtime Enforcement✓✓
Shadow AI Detection✓—

Industries served

Cisco AI Defense

  • None listed

Prediction Guard

  • Healthcare
  • Defense & National Security
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Manufacturing

Integrations

Cisco AI Defense

  • Splunk
  • ServiceNow
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Jenkins
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Google Vertex AI
  • LangChain
  • NVIDIA
  • AWS Marketplace
  • Kubernetes

Prediction Guard

  • Splunk
  • Datadog
  • Kubernetes
  • LangChain
  • AWS Marketplace
  • Microsoft Azure Marketplace

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Cisco AI Defense and Prediction Guard?+

Cisco AI Defense is Cisco's AI security product, built on Robust Intelligence: AI discovery, supply chain scanning, red teaming and runtime guardrails for apps and agents; Prediction Guard is Self-hosted AI control plane that applies runtime policy controls to models, agents and MCP tools inside the customer's own infrastructure. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (1 shared, 0 unique to Cisco AI Defense, 2 unique to Prediction Guard), pricing model, and capability overlap.

How do Cisco AI Defense and Prediction Guard pricing compare?+

Cisco AI Defense: No public prices. Cisco's AI Defense offer description (version 2.1, last modified September 23, 2026) names three packages: Advantage, Validation Essentials and Runtime Essentials; the data sheet shows supply chain scanning only in Advantage. Customers buy either per AI application or as committed usage: a prepaid balance drawn down by validation tests (600 in the first block, then 120 per block), runtime guardrails (measured in inspection tokens, in blocks of 1 billion), governed assets (blocks of 50) and endpoint agents. The runtime package assumes an aggregate limit of 10

Which AI compliance frameworks do Cisco AI Defense and Prediction Guard both support?+

Both vendors document support for NIST AI RMF. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.

Related

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.