Collibra AI Governance vs Modulos AI Governance
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/collibra-ai-governance-vs-modulos-aiCollibra AI Governance
AI governance platform for compliant, trusted AI
Collibra AI Governance is a platform that centralizes management of AI use cases, models, and agents with full visibility, trusted data, automated documentation, and built-in compliance features. It supports teams in scaling AI responsibly by providing end-to-end lineage from source data through model training, inference, deployment, and usage across platforms like AWS, Azure, Google, Databricks, SAP, and MLflow. The solution facilitates risk assessment using templates for EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, policy enforcement, model registries, and ongoing monitoring to ensure audit-readiness and regulatory adherence, particularly for regulated industries such as financial services and healthcare. Distinct from narrower tools, it integrates data governance with AI oversight in a unified system of record, enabling cross-team collaboration between AI, data, and risk functions while recommending governed data products to reduce risks from poor data quality or bias.
Modulos AI Governance
AI Governance Platform for Enterprises
Modulos AI Governance is an enterprise platform that unifies AI governance, risk management, and compliance through a connected governance graph linking frameworks, requirements, controls, risks, and evidence. It differentiates with monetary-based AI risk quantification, multi-framework support without duplication (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, DORA, NIS2), AI agents for workflow automation, and ISO 42001 product certification as the first such platform. Targeted at enterprises facing regulatory pressures like the EU AI Act, it serves sectors including financial services, transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and defense. Recent CHF 8.7M pre-Series A funding in July 2025 supports scaling ahead of 2026 deadlines.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Modulos AI Governance covers: UK AI Framework
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 7 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Collibra AI Governance | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Employees | 1000+ | 11-50 |
| Funding | Series G, $250M, 2021, valuing at $5.25B; total ~$595M | $16.4M total (pre-Series A, July 2025) |
| Pricing | Enterprise subscription; contact sales for custom quote based on users, assets, modules. | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Collibra AI Governance | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Full | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Comprehensive |
| UK AI Framework | — | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | Collibra AI Governance | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | — | ✓ |
Industries served
Collibra AI Governance
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Retail & E-commerce
Modulos AI Governance
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
Collibra AI Governance
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- ServiceNow
- Slack
- Jira
Modulos AI Governance
- GitHub
- Jira
- Microsoft SharePoint
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Collibra AI Governance and Modulos AI Governance and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.