Credo AI vs Knostic
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/credo-ai-vs-knosticCredo AI
Govern AI Everywhere.
Credo AI provides an AI governance platform that enables enterprises to discover, assess, and govern AI agents, models, and applications continuously. The platform includes an AI Registry for cataloging AI systems, Risk Intelligence for ongoing monitoring and assessment, and a Policy Engine with pre-built packs for regulatory compliance, automating workflows and generating audit-ready evidence. It serves regulated industries like financial services and healthcare, integrating with tools such as Databricks, Snowflake, AWS, Azure, Jira, ServiceNow, Slack, GitHub, and MLflow. Distinct from general GRC tools, it offers purpose-built, multi-layer governance from pre-deployment to runtime, with AI-powered intelligence for risks like hallucination and drift, supporting frameworks including EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001 Credo AI homepage, Credo AI company, Crunchbase, LinkedIn.
Knostic
Need-to-know access controls for LLMs in the enterprise
Knostic provides need-to-know access controls for enterprise AI assistants such as Microsoft Copilot, Glean, and Gemini. The platform discovers shadow AI usage, enforces knowledge-layer policies at request time, and produces audit logs that document who accessed what data through which AI system. Headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, Knostic was founded in 2023 and serves regulated industries that need to adopt LLMs without exposing sensitive internal data.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2
- Only Credo AI covers: Colorado AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001
- Only Knostic covers: ISO 27001
- Shared capabilities: 1 of 17 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Credo AI | Knostic |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, US | Herndon, US |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $21M, 2024, CrimsoNox Capital, Mozilla Ventures, FPV Ventures; total $41.3M BusinessWire | Seed, $11M, 2025 |
| Pricing | Contact sales for enterprise subscription quote. Credo AI homepage | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Credo AI | Knostic |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Partial | — |
| EU AI Act | Partial | Adjacent |
| ISO 27001 | — | Adjacent |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Partial | — |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Adjacent |
| SOC 2 | Certified | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | Credo AI | Knostic |
|---|---|---|
| AI Discovery | — | ✓ |
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | — |
| Agent Tracing | ✓ | — |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | — |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Data Leakage Prevention | — | ✓ |
| Drift Detection | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | — |
| Policy Enforcement | — | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | — |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | — |
| Shadow AI Detection | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | — |
Industries served
Credo AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
Knostic
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Government & Public Sector
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
Credo AI
- None listed
Knostic
- Microsoft Teams
- Microsoft SharePoint
- AWS Marketplace
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Credo AI and Knostic and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.