Knostic vs Trustible
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/knostic-vs-trustibleKnostic
Need-to-know access controls for LLMs in the enterprise
Knostic provides need-to-know access controls for enterprise AI assistants such as Microsoft Copilot, Glean, and Gemini. The platform discovers shadow AI usage, enforces knowledge-layer policies at request time, and produces audit logs that document who accessed what data through which AI system. Headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, Knostic was founded in 2023 and serves regulated industries that need to adopt LLMs without exposing sensitive internal data.
Trustible
Purpose-built AI governance platform for assessing, approving, and scaling AI
Trustible provides an AI governance platform that centralizes inventory of AI use cases, models, agents, and vendors, enabling organizations to track and manage AI deployment across the enterprise. The platform supports risk-based triage for intake reviews, automated risk assessments with expert-curated taxonomies, policy management, and vendor evaluations to identify transparency gaps and risks. It maps governance controls across multiple frameworks including the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001, generating audit-ready reports and evidence from actual workflows rather than self-assessments. Targeted at enterprises including Fortune 500 companies in financial services, healthcare, insurance, and consumer goods, Trustible helps cross-functional teams—risk, legal, tech, and business—accelerate low-risk AI while ensuring compliance and oversight for higher-risk systems. Distinct from general GRC tools, it embeds AI-specific intelligence like model transparency ratings and lifecycle coverage for incidents and modifications, operationalizing governance in weeks.Trustible homepage, Trustible platform, Technical.ly funding, LinkedIn, Trustible about
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
- Only Knostic covers: ISO 27001, SOC 2
- Only Trustible covers: Colorado AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001
- Shared capabilities: 0 of 11 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Knostic | Trustible |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Herndon, US | Arlington, United States |
| Employees | 11-50 | 11-50 |
| Funding | Seed, $11M, 2025 | Pre-seed $1.6M 2023; Seed $4.6M 2025 led by Lookout Ventures |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Contact sales for enterprise pricing; no public plans listed |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Knostic | Trustible |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | — | Full |
| EU AI Act | Adjacent | Full |
| ISO 27001 | Adjacent | — |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | — | Full |
| NIST AI RMF | Adjacent | Full |
| SOC 2 | Partial | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Knostic | Trustible |
|---|---|---|
| AI Discovery | ✓ | — |
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | — | ✓ |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | — |
| Data Leakage Prevention | ✓ | — |
| Policy Enforcement | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | — | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | — | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | — | ✓ |
| Shadow AI Detection | ✓ | — |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | — | ✓ |
Industries served
Knostic
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Government & Public Sector
- SaaS & Technology
Trustible
- Government & Public Sector
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
- Education
Integrations
Knostic
- Microsoft Teams
- Microsoft SharePoint
- AWS Marketplace
Trustible
- Databricks
- MLflow
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Knostic and Trustible and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.