Modulos AI Governance vs Scrut Automation
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/modulos-ai-vs-scrut-automationModulos AI Governance
AI Governance Platform for Enterprises
Modulos AI Governance is an enterprise platform that unifies AI governance, risk management, and compliance through a connected governance graph linking frameworks, requirements, controls, risks, and evidence. It differentiates with monetary-based AI risk quantification, multi-framework support without duplication (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, DORA, NIS2), AI agents for workflow automation, and ISO 42001 product certification as the first such platform. Targeted at enterprises facing regulatory pressures like the EU AI Act, it serves sectors including financial services, transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and defense. Recent CHF 8.7M pre-Series A funding in July 2025 supports scaling ahead of 2026 deadlines.
Scrut Automation
Security-First GRC for Modern Risk & Compliance
Scrut Automation is a cloud-based GRC platform that automates compliance management, risk assessment, and audit preparation for growth-stage SaaS and cloud-native companies. It differentiates through continuous monitoring of 230+ security controls, automated evidence collection from 75+ integrations, and support for 70+ frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001, enabling multi-framework compliance without redundancy. Typical buyers are CISOs and compliance teams at startups and mid-market firms seeking to accelerate audits, reduce manual work, and maintain real-time visibility into cloud, application, people, and third-party risks. Featured in Forrester's GRC Platforms Landscape, it has raised $20.5M total funding, with the latest $10M growth round in 2024 from Lightspeed, MassMutual Ventures, and Endiya Partners to enhance AI capabilities and expand in North America and Europe.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Modulos AI Governance covers: EU AI Act, UK AI Framework
- Only Scrut Automation covers: GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 2
- Shared capabilities: 6 of 6 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Modulos AI Governance | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Zurich, Switzerland | Palo Alto, US |
| Employees | 11-50 | 51-200 |
| Funding | $16.4M total (pre-Series A, July 2025) | $20.5M total (Growth, April 2024) |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Modulos AI Governance | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Comprehensive | — |
| GDPR Art. 22 | — | Comprehensive |
| HIPAA | — | Comprehensive |
| ISO 27001 | — | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Comprehensive | Comprehensive |
| PCI DSS | — | Comprehensive |
| SOC 2 | — | Comprehensive |
| UK AI Framework | Partial | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Modulos AI Governance | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Modulos AI Governance
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Scrut Automation
- SaaS & Technology
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
Integrations
Modulos AI Governance
- GitHub
- Jira
- Microsoft SharePoint
Scrut Automation
- AWS SageMaker
- Okta
- Jira
- Slack
- GitHub
- Azure ML
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Modulos AI Governance and Scrut Automation and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.