BigID vs Drata
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked September 2026.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/bigid-vs-drataBigID
Enterprise Data Security Platform for DSPM & AI — enterprise-scale data discovery, security, and compliance.
BigID is an enterprise data security and AI governance platform that uses patented AI-driven classification to discover, classify, and govern sensitive data across cloud, SaaS, on-premises, and AI environments. Its AI governance capabilities include shadow AI discovery, AI model inventory, employee AI access governance, AI security posture management (AISPM), secure data pipelines for AI training, and compliance tooling for EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF. BigID also provides comprehensive data privacy, DSPM, DLP, and data minimization capabilities for regulated industries.
Drata
Compliance automation and GRC platform with 30+ pre-built frameworks, including ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF and AIUC-1
Drata is a compliance automation and governance, risk and compliance (GRC) platform founded in 2020. Its about page lists offices in San Francisco, New York, San Diego, London and Sydney. It says more than 8,500 organizations use it, and it reported about $100 million in annual recurring revenue in February 2025. Its last disclosed round was a $200 million Series C co-led by ICONIQ Growth and GGV Capital in December 2022 at a $2 billion valuation, which took total funding past $328 million. It bought Harmonize.io and oak9 in 2024 and the trust center company SafeBase for $250 million in February 2025. The platform offers more than 30 pre-built frameworks with continuous control monitoring, automated evidence collection, policies, risk management, third-party risk management with agent-based assessments, and a Trust Center built on SafeBase. Its AI features include questionnaire assistance, mapping policies to controls, explanations of failed tests and an MCP server. More than 175 audit firms are in its Audit Alliance. **AI compliance coverage** Drata has framework pages for ISO/IEC 42001, which maps the standard's requirements to its control library and links AI-specific risks to controls, and for the NIST AI RMF, supported since December 2023. It also lists AIUC-1. The EU AI Act is not in its framework list; the Act is mentioned only for AI Agent Governance, a limited-availability product announced in August 2026 that enforces policy on AI agents and maps to ISO 42001, the EU AI Act and AIUC-1. **Who it's for** Growth-stage and enterprise companies running SOC 2, ISO 27001 and similar programs that want ISO 42001 or the NIST AI RMF on the same platform. It is not a model testing or LLM content filtering tool.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, NIST AI RMF, PCI DSS
- Only Drata covers: ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 11 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | BigID | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | United States |
| Employees | 501-1000 | Undisclosed |
| Funding | $306M total; most recent: $60M Series E (Riverwood Capital) | $328M+ total; latest disclosed round a $200M Series C co-led by ICONIQ Growth and GGV Capital (December 2022) at a $2B valuation |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | GRC plans (Foundation, Advanced, Enterprise) and Assurance plans (Trust Center and questionnaires) are quoted; drata.com shows no prices. Its AWS Marketplace listing charges a $25,000 platform fee for a 100-FTE organization plus $7,500 per framework, for a 12-month contract. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | BigID | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | Adjacent |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | Adjacent |
| HIPAA | Partial | Comprehensive |
| ISO 27001 | — | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | — | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Comprehensive |
| PCI DSS | Certified | Comprehensive |
| SOC 2 | — | Comprehensive |
Capabilities
| Capability | BigID | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | — |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Logging | ✓ | — |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Data Lineage | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
BigID
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
Drata
- SaaS & Technology
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Government & Public Sector
Integrations
BigID
- None listed
Drata
- Okta
- GitHub
- Slack
- Microsoft Entra ID
- Rippling
- Cloudflare
- CircleCI
- Anthropic API
- AWS GovCloud
- AWS Marketplace
Frequently asked
What is the difference between BigID and Drata?+
BigID is Enterprise Data Security Platform for DSPM & AI — enterprise-scale data discovery, security, and compliance; Drata is Compliance automation and GRC platform with 30+ pre-built frameworks, including ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF and AIUC-1. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (5 shared, 0 unique to BigID, 3 unique to Drata), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do BigID and Drata pricing compare?+
BigID: Pricing not publicly disclosed. Drata: GRC plans (Foundation, Advanced, Enterprise) and Assurance plans (Trust Center and questionnaires) are quoted; drata.com shows no prices. Its AWS Marketplace listing charges a $25,000 platform fee for a 100-FTE organization plus $7,500 per framework, for a 12-month contract.
Which AI compliance frameworks do BigID and Drata both support?+
Both vendors document support for EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, NIST AI RMF, PCI DSS. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.
Related
Keep reading
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.