LatticeFlow AI vs Modulos AI Governance

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/latticeflow-ai-vs-modulos-ai

LatticeFlow AI

A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.

LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.

Last verified April 22, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

Modulos AI Governance

AI Governance Platform for Enterprises

Modulos AI Governance is an enterprise platform that unifies AI governance, risk management, and compliance through a connected governance graph linking frameworks, requirements, controls, risks, and evidence. It differentiates with monetary-based AI risk quantification, multi-framework support without duplication (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, DORA, NIS2), AI agents for workflow automation, and ISO 42001 product certification as the first such platform. Targeted at enterprises facing regulatory pressures like the EU AI Act, it serves sectors including financial services, transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and defense. Recent CHF 8.7M pre-Series A funding in July 2025 supports scaling ahead of 2026 deadlines.

Last verified April 24, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Modulos AI Governance covers: UK AI Framework
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 10 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeLatticeFlow AIModulos AI Governance
Founded20202018
HeadquartersZurich, SwitzerlandZurich, Switzerland
Employees11-5011-50
FundingSeries A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021).$16.4M total (pre-Series A, July 2025)
PricingNo public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing.Contact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkLatticeFlow AIModulos AI Governance
EU AI ActFullComprehensive
ISO/IEC 42001FullComprehensive
NIST AI RMFFullComprehensive
UK AI FrameworkPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityLatticeFlow AIModulos AI Governance
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Risk Management

Industries served

LatticeFlow AI

  • Financial Services
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Modulos AI Governance

  • Financial Services
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

LatticeFlow AI

  • OpenAI API
  • GitHub

Modulos AI Governance

  • GitHub
  • Jira
  • Microsoft SharePoint

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to LatticeFlow AI and Modulos AI Governance and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.