LatticeFlow AI vs Modulos AI Governance
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/latticeflow-ai-vs-modulos-aiLatticeFlow AI
A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.
LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.
Modulos AI Governance
AI Governance Platform for Enterprises
Modulos AI Governance is an enterprise platform that unifies AI governance, risk management, and compliance through a connected governance graph linking frameworks, requirements, controls, risks, and evidence. It differentiates with monetary-based AI risk quantification, multi-framework support without duplication (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, DORA, NIS2), AI agents for workflow automation, and ISO 42001 product certification as the first such platform. Targeted at enterprises facing regulatory pressures like the EU AI Act, it serves sectors including financial services, transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and defense. Recent CHF 8.7M pre-Series A funding in July 2025 supports scaling ahead of 2026 deadlines.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Modulos AI Governance covers: UK AI Framework
- Shared capabilities: 5 of 10 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | LatticeFlow AI | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Zurich, Switzerland | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Employees | 11-50 | 11-50 |
| Funding | Series A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021). | $16.4M total (pre-Series A, July 2025) |
| Pricing | No public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing. | Contact for pricing |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | LatticeFlow AI | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Full | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Comprehensive |
| UK AI Framework | — | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | LatticeFlow AI | Modulos AI Governance |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Explainability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | — | ✓ |
Industries served
LatticeFlow AI
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Modulos AI Governance
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
LatticeFlow AI
- OpenAI API
- GitHub
Modulos AI Governance
- GitHub
- Jira
- Microsoft SharePoint
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to LatticeFlow AI and Modulos AI Governance and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.