Fiddler AI vs LatticeFlow AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified April 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-latticeflow-ai

Fiddler AI

AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.

Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.

Last verified April 21, 2026Palo Alto, United States

LatticeFlow AI

A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.

LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.

Last verified April 22, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
  • Shared capabilities: 8 of 10 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeFiddler AILatticeFlow AI
Founded20182020
HeadquartersPalo Alto, United StatesZurich, Switzerland
Employees51-20011-50
Funding$100M total (Series C, January 2026)Series A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021).
PricingContact for pricingNo public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkFiddler AILatticeFlow AI
Colorado AI ActPartial
EU AI ActPartialFull
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001PartialFull
NIST AI RMFPartialFull
NYC LL 144Partial

Capabilities

CapabilityFiddler AILatticeFlow AI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Fiddler AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Employment & HR
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • SaaS & Technology
  • Defense & National Security

LatticeFlow AI

  • Financial Services
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Fiddler AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • Weights & Biases
  • Okta
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

LatticeFlow AI

  • OpenAI API
  • GitHub

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and LatticeFlow AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.