Fiddler AI vs LatticeFlow AI
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified April 2026.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fiddler-ai-vs-latticeflow-aiFiddler AI
AI observability and security for agentic and generative systems.
Fiddler AI is an AI observability and security platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, by Krishna Gade, Amit Paka, and Manoj Cheenath. Fiddler focuses on production monitoring — drift, performance, fairness, explainability — and has extended into LLM observability and security for compound and agentic AI systems. Fiddler raised a $30M Series C in January 2026, bringing total funding to $100M.
LatticeFlow AI
A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.
LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Fiddler AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144
- Shared capabilities: 8 of 10 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Fiddler AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $100M total (Series C, January 2026) | Series A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021). |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | No public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Fiddler AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Partial | — |
| EU AI Act | Partial | Full |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | — |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Partial | Full |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Full |
| NYC LL 144 | Partial | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Fiddler AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | — | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Fiddler AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Government & Public Sector
- Employment & HR
- Retail & E-commerce
- SaaS & Technology
- Defense & National Security
LatticeFlow AI
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
Fiddler AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- Weights & Biases
- Okta
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
LatticeFlow AI
- OpenAI API
- GitHub
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fiddler AI and LatticeFlow AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.