QL Security vs Sprinto
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked September 2026.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/ql-security-vs-sprintoQL Security
AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO 42001 implementation services.
QL Security is a UK-based consultancy providing AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO/IEC 42001 implementation support for organisations managing AI risk. Services are delivered as an advisory engagement rather than a SaaS product.
Sprinto
Agent-driven compliance automation platform for startups and mid-market companies, with ISO 42001 support and AI tool discovery
Sprinto is a compliance automation (GRC) platform founded in 2020 by Girish Redekar and Raghuveer Kancherla. It operates from Bengaluru and San Francisco through Sprinto Technology Private Limited and Sprinto, Inc. It has raised $31.8 million, most recently a $20 million Series B led by Accel in April 2024, and says more than 4,000 companies use it. The platform automates continuous monitoring, evidence collection, policies, risk and vendor management and audit preparation through 300+ integrations. Sprinto says 25+ frameworks are automated out of the box and 200+ are digitized, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS. In March 2026 it announced an Autonomous Trust Platform of software agents that refresh evidence, run vendor due-diligence questionnaires and track control gaps to closure; its AI Playground lets teams build their own agents without code. **AI compliance coverage** Sprinto has a dedicated ISO/IEC 42001 offering with policy templates, control coverage, continuous monitoring and expert guidance, and detects AI tool use across browser extensions, managed devices, integrations and SSO sign-ins. Its EU AI Act material is a free applicability checker and a landing page promising automated AI risk classification; the NIST AI RMF is mentioned only as a control set it maps from. AI Governance is sold as an add-on. **Who it's for** Startups and mid-market companies that need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 and want ISO 42001 on the same platform. Named customers include WeWork, Anaconda and Whatfix.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2
- Only QL Security covers: GDPR Art. 22
- Only Sprinto covers: HIPAA, PCI DSS
- Shared capabilities: 3 of 13 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | QL Security | Sprinto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | Undisclosed | 2020 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | India |
| Employees | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Funding | Undisclosed | $31.8M total; latest round a $20M Series B led by Accel (April 2024) |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | No public prices. Three plans (Foundation, Growth, Platform) are quoted by sales. Foundation includes 25+ automated frameworks, 20 AI-powered security questionnaires a year and an AI systems inventory. Add-ons include additional frameworks, AI Governance, Enterprise Risk Management, Enterprise Trust Management and Enterprise Vendor Risk Management. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | QL Security | Sprinto |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | limited |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | — |
| HIPAA | — | Comprehensive |
| ISO 27001 | Partial | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Partial | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Adjacent |
| PCI DSS | — | Comprehensive |
| SOC 2 | Partial | Comprehensive |
Capabilities
| Capability | QL Security | Sprinto |
|---|---|---|
| AI Discovery | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | — | ✓ |
| Compliance Reporting | ✓ | — |
| Data Leakage Prevention | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | — | ✓ |
| Prompt Injection Defense | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | — | ✓ |
| Shadow AI Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
QL Security
- SaaS & Technology
Sprinto
- None listed
Integrations
QL Security
- None listed
Sprinto
- Okta
- Microsoft Entra ID
- Google Workspace
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Jira
- Slack
- Microsoft Teams
- Datadog
- ServiceNow
- Snowflake
- Rippling
- Cloudflare
- Docker
- Jenkins
- Microsoft SharePoint
- MongoDB
- AWS GovCloud
Frequently asked
What is the difference between QL Security and Sprinto?+
QL Security is AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO 42001 implementation services; Sprinto is Agent-driven compliance automation platform for startups and mid-market companies, with ISO 42001 support and AI tool discovery. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (5 shared, 1 unique to QL Security, 2 unique to Sprinto), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do QL Security and Sprinto pricing compare?+
QL Security: Pricing not publicly disclosed. Sprinto: No public prices. Three plans (Foundation, Growth, Platform) are quoted by sales. Foundation includes 25+ automated frameworks, 20 AI-powered security questionnaires a year and an AI systems inventory. Add-ons include additional frameworks, AI Governance, Enterprise Risk Management, Enterprise Trust Management and Enterprise Vendor Risk Management.
Which AI compliance frameworks do QL Security and Sprinto both support?+
Both vendors document support for EU AI Act, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.
Related
Keep reading
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.