QL Security vs Vanta
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked September 2026.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/ql-security-vs-vantaQL Security
AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO 42001 implementation services.
QL Security is a UK-based consultancy providing AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO/IEC 42001 implementation support for organisations managing AI risk. Services are delivered as an advisory engagement rather than a SaaS product.
Vanta
Compliance automation and trust management platform covering 35+ frameworks, including ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act
Vanta is a compliance automation and trust management platform founded in 2018 and based in San Francisco. It says 16,000 companies use it and that it passed $300 million in annual recurring revenue in April 2026. It has raised $504 million since 2021; its latest round was a $150 million Series D led by Wellington Management in July 2025 at a $4.15 billion valuation, and Fortune reported no newer round as of April 2026. The platform connects to more than 400 tools to collect audit evidence, run continuous control tests, manage policies, risks and access reviews, and publish a Trust Center. Vanta says its AI answers more than 80% of security questionnaire questions. In November 2025 it launched an agent-based Agentic Trust Platform for evidence, questionnaires, vendor oversight and risk, and its agent can be used inside Claude and Cursor through an MCP server. It bought Riskey, a third- and fourth-party risk monitoring company, in July 2025. More than 100 audit firms work in the platform. **AI compliance coverage** Vanta has dedicated products for ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF (launched in preview in January 2024 with 60 pre-built requirements and 10 risk scenarios) and the EU AI Act (announced in October 2024). The ISO 42001 product includes policy and document templates, mapped controls, automated tests, AI risk scenarios and access to accredited ISO 42001 auditors who review evidence in the platform. The EU AI Act product classifies AI systems by role and risk level, inventories AI use, and provides templates, AI-drafted policies, impact assessments and post-market monitoring records. **Who it's for** Startups through enterprises that need SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA and want AI frameworks on the same platform. It manages governance evidence; it does not test models.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2
- Only Vanta covers: HIPAA, PCI DSS
- Shared capabilities: 2 of 13 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | QL Security | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | Undisclosed | 2018 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Employees | Undisclosed | 501-1000 |
| Funding | Undisclosed | $504M raised since 2021; latest round a $150M Series D led by Wellington Management (July 2025) at a $4.15B valuation |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Four plans: Essentials, Plus, Professional and Enterprise. No prices on vanta.com; its AWS Marketplace listing gives 12-month starting prices for 1-20 employees: Essentials $14,000, Plus $21,500, Professional $23,000. Enterprise is quoted. Third-party risk management is a separate product ($13,600 a year for up to 50 vendors on AWS). |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | QL Security | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Partial | Comprehensive |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | Adjacent |
| HIPAA | — | Comprehensive |
| ISO 27001 | Partial | Comprehensive |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Partial | Comprehensive |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Comprehensive |
| PCI DSS | — | Comprehensive |
| SOC 2 | Partial | Comprehensive |
Capabilities
| Capability | QL Security | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| AI Discovery | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Guardrails | ✓ | — |
| AI Model Inventory | — | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | — | ✓ |
| Compliance Reporting | ✓ | — |
| Data Leakage Prevention | ✓ | — |
| LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | — | ✓ |
| Prompt Injection Defense | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | — | ✓ |
| Shadow AI Detection | ✓ | — |
| Third-Party AI Risk Management | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
QL Security
- SaaS & Technology
Vanta
- None listed
Integrations
QL Security
- None listed
Vanta
- Okta
- GitHub
- Jira
- Slack
- AWS Marketplace
Frequently asked
What is the difference between QL Security and Vanta?+
QL Security is AI security, governance, compliance, assurance, and ISO 42001 implementation services; Vanta is Compliance automation and trust management platform covering 35+ frameworks, including ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (6 shared, 0 unique to QL Security, 2 unique to Vanta), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do QL Security and Vanta pricing compare?+
QL Security: Pricing not publicly disclosed. Vanta: Four plans: Essentials, Plus, Professional and Enterprise. No prices on vanta.com; its AWS Marketplace listing gives 12-month starting prices for 1-20 employees: Essentials $14,000, Plus $21,500, Professional $23,000. Enterprise is quoted. Third-party risk management is a separate product ($13,600 a year for up to 50 vendors on AWS).
Which AI compliance frameworks do QL Security and Vanta both support?+
Both vendors document support for EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and 1 more. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.
Related
Keep reading
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.