Fairly AI vs Lasso Security
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fairly-ai-vs-lasso-securityFairly AI
AI GRC in a box for regulated industries.
Fairly AI is an AI governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform founded in 2020 by David Van Bruwaene and Fion Lee-Madan, incubated at Accenture's FinTech Innovation Lab. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario with a Toronto presence, Fairly AI targets regulated industries — finance, healthcare, and government — with an on-premises or private-cloud platform that benchmarks models against internal policies and external regulations.
Lasso Security
Secure AI Adoption at Enterprise Scale
Lasso Security provides an AI Security Platform that delivers visibility, control, and protection across AI models, agents, and applications for enterprises. The platform inventories AI assets including agents, models, prompts, tools, and guardrails via discovery and AI-BOM features. It offers AI Security Posture Management for misconfigurations, supply chain risks, and alignment with NIST and OWASP frameworks. Automated red teaming uses a library of over 3,000 attacks covering OWASP Top 10 and agentic threats like context poisoning. Runtime enforcement provides zero-latency decisions with remediation guidance, while AI Detection & Response leverages MITRE and OWASP for threat detection with 98.6% accuracy and sub-50ms latency, including intent analysis for anomalies. Lasso targets enterprises adopting GenAI, particularly regulated sectors, enabling secure innovation through real-time risk reduction, governance, and compliance support. The platform maps to frameworks like NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and ISO/IEC 42001 via runtime policies and audit trails, integrating with tools like Cloudflare and Palo Alto Networks.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Fairly AI covers: Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144
- Only Lasso Security covers: SOC 2
- Shared capabilities: 6 of 14 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Fairly AI | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Kitchener, Canada | Tel Aviv, IL |
| Employees | 11-50 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $1.7M USD Pre-seed (April 2023) | Seed, $6M, 2023-11 |
| Pricing | On-premises or private-cloud deployments; quote-based. | Enterprise pricing only. Not publicly listed. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Fairly AI | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Partial | — |
| EU AI Act | Full | Partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Partial |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | Partial | — |
| SOC 2 | — | Comprehensive |
Capabilities
| Capability | Fairly AI | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| AI Bill of Materials | — | ✓ |
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Supply Chain Risk | — | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | — |
| Explainability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt Injection Defense | — | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Runtime Enforcement | — | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | — |
Industries served
Fairly AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Employment & HR
- SaaS & Technology
Lasso Security
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Government & Public Sector
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
Fairly AI
- MLflow
Lasso Security
- Cloudflare
- Palo Alto Networks
- AWS GovCloud
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fairly AI and Lasso Security and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.