Fairly AI vs FairNow
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified April 2026.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/fairly-ai-vs-fairnowFairly AI
AI GRC in a box for regulated industries.
Fairly AI is an AI governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform founded in 2020 by David Van Bruwaene and Fion Lee-Madan, incubated at Accenture's FinTech Innovation Lab. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario with a Toronto presence, Fairly AI targets regulated industries — finance, healthcare, and government — with an on-premises or private-cloud platform that benchmarks models against internal policies and external regulations.
FairNow
AI governance platform simplifying risk and compliance for AI systems
FairNow offers an end-to-end AI governance platform that centralizes AI system inventory, automates risk assessments, compliance workflows, and regulatory monitoring with real-time alerts. It targets enterprises building or using AI in regulated areas like financial services and HR, providing harmonized controls across 25+ global regulations and standards. The platform distinguishes itself through purpose-built automations for bias testing, evidence collection, model cards, and audit readiness, reducing manual efforts compared to general GRC tools. Acquired by AuditBoard in 2025, it integrates AI-specific governance into broader risk management.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, NYC LL 144
- Only Fairly AI covers: Colorado AI Act
- Shared capabilities: 7 of 11 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Fairly AI | FairNow |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Kitchener, Canada | McLean, US |
| Employees | 11-50 | 11-50 |
| Funding | $1.7M USD Pre-seed (April 2023) | $3.5M seed, June 2024, led by Somen Mondal and Shaun Ricci |
| Pricing | On-premises or private-cloud deployments; quote-based. | Contact sales for quote; no public pricing listed |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Fairly AI | FairNow |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Partial | — |
| EU AI Act | Full | Partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Partial |
| NIST AI RMF | Partial | Partial |
| NYC LL 144 | Partial | Partial |
Capabilities
| Capability | Fairly AI | FairNow |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Logging | — | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | ✓ | — |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | — |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | — |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-Party AI Vendor Risk | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Fairly AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Employment & HR
- SaaS & Technology
FairNow
- Employment & HR
Integrations
Fairly AI
- MLflow
FairNow
- None listed
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Fairly AI and FairNow?+
Fairly AI is AI GRC in a box for regulated industries; FairNow is AI governance platform simplifying risk and compliance for AI systems. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (4 shared, 1 unique to Fairly AI, 0 unique to FairNow), pricing model, and capability overlap.
How do Fairly AI and FairNow pricing compare?+
Fairly AI: On-premises or private-cloud deployments; quote-based. FairNow: Contact sales for quote; no public pricing listed
Which AI compliance frameworks do Fairly AI and FairNow both support?+
Both vendors document support for EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, NYC LL 144. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Fairly AI and FairNow and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Related
Keep reading
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.