Giskard vs Lakera

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/giskard-ai-vs-lakera

Giskard

Test your AI agents to catch issues before they happen in production

Giskard is an open-source and enterprise platform for automated red-teaming and evaluation of AI models and LLM agents, detecting vulnerabilities like hallucinations, prompt injections, biases, and robustness issues through continuous scanning and test suites. It differentiates with black-box testing, collaborative workflows for business and technical teams, and integration of domain knowledge for exhaustive, domain-specific tests. Typical buyers are AI engineering, security, and data science teams at enterprises in finance, manufacturing, public sector, and defense deploying production AI systems. The platform supports compliance via GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA features, and was recognized in Gartner's 2023 Market Guide for AI Trust, Risk and Security Management.

Last verified April 24, 2026Paris, France

Lakera

The leading security platform to secure your AI future.

Lakera is a Zurich-based AI security company founded in 2021 by former Google, Meta, and aerospace engineers. The company provides the Lakera Guard platform, which offers real-time prompt injection prevention, data leakage protection, jailbreak detection, and AI agent security for enterprise generative AI deployments. It operates across workforce AI security, AI agent security, and AI red teaming, with sub-50ms runtime latency and a SaaS-first, API-first architecture. Lakera is the creator of Gandalf, a widely used AI security educational game with over 1 million players and 80M+ prompts collected, which provides a continuously updated threat intelligence database. The company is cited in the OWASP LLM and GenAI Security Landscape Guide 2025, recognized as a Representative Vendor in the 2024 Gartner Innovation Guide for Generative AI (TRiSM), and had Lakera's CEO join the World Economic Forum 2024 alongside Yann LeCun and others. Named customers include Dropbox and a top-3 US bank.

Last verified April 22, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Giskard covers: GDPR Art. 22, HIPAA, SOC 2
  • Only Lakera covers: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 3 of 11 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeGiskardLakera
Founded20212021
HeadquartersParis, FranceZurich, Switzerland
Employees11-5051-100
Funding$4.9M total (Grant, May 2024)Series A, $20M raised (July 2024), led by Atomico with participation from Citi Ventures, Dropbox Ventures, and redalpine. Prior seed of $10M (2023) led by redalpine. Total raised: $30M.
PricingContact for pricingEnterprise-focused SaaS. No public pricing listed. API-based pricing model expected. Contact sales.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkGiskardLakera
EU AI ActPartial
GDPR Art. 22Comprehensive
HIPAAComprehensive
NIST AI RMFPartial
SOC 2Comprehensive

Capabilities

CapabilityGiskardLakera
Bias & Fairness Testing
Drift Detection
Explainability
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Giskard

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Government & Public Sector
  • Defense & National Security
  • Manufacturing
  • SaaS & Technology

Lakera

  • SaaS & Technology
  • Education
  • Financial Services

Integrations

Giskard

  • MLflow
  • OpenAI API
  • LiteLLM
  • Ollama

Lakera

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Giskard and Lakera and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.