AI Compliance Vendors

Giskard vs WitnessAI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last checked October 2026.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/giskard-ai-vs-witnessai

Giskard

European platform for red teaming, evaluating and guarding AI agents, with an Apache 2.0 open-source library and on-premise deployment

Giskard is a Paris-based company founded in 2021 by Alex Combessie, Jean-Marie John-Mathews and Andrei Avtomonov. Combessie and John-Mathews are now co-CEOs, and Giskard says its co-founders previously built AI systems at Dataiku and Thales. It sells software and services for testing and securing LLM agents. Its first funding round, €1.5 million led by Elaia with Bessemer Venture Partners, was announced in December 2022. Giskard says it also received a €3 million strategic investment through the European Commission's EIC Accelerator in 2023 and a €3 million Bpifrance grant in 2024 for LLM evaluation research with Mistral AI, Artefact, INA and BnF. CORDIS lists a €2.5 million EU contribution to its EIC project, which ran from September 2023 to August 2025. Giskard Hub is the paid platform. Continuous red teaming runs multi-turn attacks that adapt to the agent's answers, generated from the company's own documents and knowledge bases. It tests for hallucinations, stereotypes and discrimination, harmful content, disclosure of personal information and prompt injection. Testing is black-box: the agent only needs an API endpoint, and coverage is limited to text-to-text conversational agents. The Hub also schedules agent evaluations and manages test datasets, custom checks and human review, with alerts, SSO, role-based access and audit logs. It runs as SaaS, in a private cloud or on premises, with EU or US data processing. Giskard Guards, launched in April 2026, is a runtime guardrail layer that runs in the customer's infrastructure. It inspects prompts, responses, tool calls and multi-step reasoning, and its policies are written as code in OPA/Rego. Giskard also sells AI security audits that end in a go/no-go report, and it is offering a free trial of a new Agentic Red Teamer to a limited number of users. The open-source library is Apache 2.0 licensed. Version 3, a rewrite for multi-turn agent testing, became stable in August 2026. Version 2 is no longer actively maintained, and tabular models have no v3 equivalent. Giskard also publishes Phare, an LLM safety benchmark launched in February 2025 with Google DeepMind as research partner. Logos on its site include BNP Paribas, AXA, BPCE, Société Générale, Crédit Agricole, Michelin, Decathlon, L'Oréal and Doctolib. **AI compliance coverage** Guards includes an EU AI Act policy pack for prohibited practices such as social scoring and real-time biometric identification, and Giskard says Guards covers OWASP LLM risks. It doesn't map its products to the NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001. Its trust center, run on Bastion, lists GDPR and a SOC 2 Type 2 report and shows HIPAA as in progress. **Who it's for** Enterprises, especially in European banking and insurance, that run customer-facing LLM agents and want testing and runtime controls they can deploy on premises.

Last checked October 15, 2026Paris, France

WitnessAI

Network-level visibility, policy control and runtime protection for employee AI use and AI agents, with list prices on AWS Marketplace

WitnessAI is an AI security and governance platform for enterprise AI use by employees and by AI agents. It was founded in 2023 and incubated by Ballistic Ventures. CEO Rick Caccia, previously SVP of marketing at Palo Alto Networks, is the only co-founder the company names. It is based in Mountain View, California, and has raised about $85.5 million in two announced rounds: $27.5 million co-led by GV and Ballistic Ventures (May 2024) and $58 million in strategic funding led by Sound Ventures (January 2026), with Fin Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, Samsung Ventures and Forgepoint Capital Partners taking part. The platform has three modules. Observe finds the AI apps, agents and MCP servers in use, drawing on a catalog of thousands of AI applications, and classifies conversations by intent. Control sets policies by department, role, intent or workforce type, routes prompts to approved or cheaper models, limits agents to approved MCP servers and tools, redacts sensitive data in real time and keeps audit trails. Protect (Witness Protect, which WitnessAI calls "the enterprise AI firewall") screens prompts and responses for prompt injection, jailbreaks and harmful output and tokenizes PII, credentials and secrets. Witness Attack runs automated red teaming against models before deployment. WitnessAI says it sees AI activity across the network without browser extensions or endpoint clients, including native apps such as Windows 11 Copilot and Office 365, and it integrates with F5 BIG-IP SSL Orchestrator for encrypted AI traffic. Each customer gets a single-tenant instance with customer-controlled encryption. In January 2026 it launched WitnessAI Agentic Security, which covers coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex and records the user, agent, tool and rule for every blocked tool call. In July 2026 it added AI FinOps features: spend estimates for unsanctioned AI apps and agents, metering of sanctioned token use, an ROI dashboard and cost-based model routing. **AI compliance coverage** The compliance page offers logging of every AI app and interaction, policy enforcement and masking of regulated data, but names no AI framework. WitnessAI's AWS Marketplace listing says its audit trails support compliance reporting for the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and PCI DSS 4.0.1. We found no control mappings for any of them. WitnessAI announced a SOC 2 Type II attestation in October 2025; it has no public trust center. **Who it's for** Large enterprises that want to see and govern how employees and agents use public and internal AI tools, and to add runtime protection to their own AI apps. WitnessAI says its customers include financial services firms, utilities, airlines, automakers, retailers and telecoms. InComm Payments is the only customer it names on its site.

Last checked October 15, 2026Mountain View, United States

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act
  • Only Giskard covers: SOC 2
  • Only WitnessAI covers: ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, PCI DSS
  • Shared capabilities: 5 of 16 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeGiskardWitnessAI
Founded20212023
HeadquartersParis, FranceMountain View, United States
EmployeesUndisclosedUndisclosed
Funding€1.5M first round led by Elaia (December 2022), plus a €3M EIC Accelerator investment (2023) and a €3M Bpifrance research grant (2024), per GiskardAbout $85.5M across two announced rounds; latest a $58M strategic round led by Sound Ventures (January 2026)
PricingNo prices are published. Two plans: Open-source, a free Python library for local agent experiments with community support, and Professional, quoted on request ('Get your AI audited'). Professional adds automated audits with 50+ adversarial probes, evaluation dataset generation, SSO and role-based access, CI/CD integration through the SDK, on-premise, private cloud or SaaS deployment, and support with SLAs. Advisory on fixes and guardrails is an extra service. Giskard advertises a free Agentic Red Teamer trial with limited spots and an offer for startups and small teams, without stating terms for either.No prices on witness.ai. Its AWS Marketplace listing gives 12-month prices: WitnessAI for Enterprise at $180 per user (minimum 1,000 users, $180,000), WitnessAI Agentic Visibility at $24 per agent (minimum 2,500 agents, $60,000) and WitnessProtect model protection guardrail at $300,000.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkGiskardWitnessAI
EU AI Actlimitedlimited
ISO/IEC 42001—limited
NIST AI RMF—limited
PCI DSS—limited
SOC 2Certified—

Capabilities

CapabilityGiskardWitnessAI
AI Discovery—✓
AI Guardrails✓—
Agentic Red Teaming✓—
Audit Logging✓✓
Bias & Fairness Testing✓—
Data Leakage Prevention✓✓
Hallucination Detection✓—
Human-in-the-Loop✓—
LLM Evaluation✓—
LLM Guardrails—✓
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering—✓
LLM Red Teaming✓✓
Policy Enforcement✓✓
Prompt Injection Defense✓✓
Runtime Enforcement—✓
Shadow AI Detection—✓

Industries served

Giskard

  • Financial Services
  • Insurance

WitnessAI

  • Financial Services
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • Telecommunications

Integrations

Giskard

  • LiteLLM
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

WitnessAI

  • Okta
  • Microsoft Entra ID
  • AWS Marketplace

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Giskard and WitnessAI?+

Giskard is European platform for red teaming, evaluating and guarding AI agents, with an Apache 2.0 open-source library and on-premise deployment; WitnessAI is Network-level visibility, policy control and runtime protection for employee AI use and AI agents, with list prices on AWS Marketplace. The full side-by-side covers framework coverage (1 shared, 1 unique to Giskard, 3 unique to WitnessAI), pricing model, and capability overlap.

How do Giskard and WitnessAI pricing compare?+

Giskard: No prices are published. Two plans: Open-source, a free Python library for local agent experiments with community support, and Professional, quoted on request ('Get your AI audited'). Professional adds automated audits with 50+ adversarial probes, evaluation dataset generation, SSO and role-based access, CI/CD integration through the SDK, on-premise, private cloud or SaaS deployment, and support with SLAs. Advisory on fixes and guardrails is an extra service. Giskard advertises a free Agentic Red Teamer trial with limited spots and an offer for startups and small teams, without statin

Which AI compliance frameworks do Giskard and WitnessAI both support?+

Both vendors document support for EU AI Act. Coverage strength varies; see the framework matrix below.

Related

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.