Lakera vs Promptfoo

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/lakera-vs-promptfoo

Lakera

The leading security platform to secure your AI future.

Lakera is a Zurich-based AI security company founded in 2021 by former Google, Meta, and aerospace engineers. The company provides the Lakera Guard platform, which offers real-time prompt injection prevention, data leakage protection, jailbreak detection, and AI agent security for enterprise generative AI deployments. It operates across workforce AI security, AI agent security, and AI red teaming, with sub-50ms runtime latency and a SaaS-first, API-first architecture. Lakera is the creator of Gandalf, a widely used AI security educational game with over 1 million players and 80M+ prompts collected, which provides a continuously updated threat intelligence database. The company is cited in the OWASP LLM and GenAI Security Landscape Guide 2025, recognized as a Representative Vendor in the 2024 Gartner Innovation Guide for Generative AI (TRiSM), and had Lakera's CEO join the World Economic Forum 2024 alongside Yann LeCun and others. Named customers include Dropbox and a top-3 US bank.

Last verified April 22, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

Promptfoo

Build Secure AI Applications

Promptfoo is an open-source CLI and library for evaluating LLM prompts, models, RAGs, and agents through automated benchmarks and matrix comparisons, alongside red-teaming for security vulnerabilities like prompt injections, jailbreaks, PII leaks, and insecure tool use. It differentiates via developer-first local execution, CI/CD integration, and modular plugins covering 50+ attack types with community-driven threat intelligence. Targeted at developers and security teams in enterprises (127 Fortune 500 users), it supports self-hosting to avoid vendor lock-in. Enterprise adds collaboration, monitoring, SSO, and compliance dashboards. Acquired by OpenAI in March 2026 for integration into Frontier platform, remains open-source with SaaS/on-prem options.Promptfoo homepagePromptfoo docsPromptfoo pricing

Last verified April 24, 2026San Francisco, US

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: None documented in common.
  • Only Lakera covers: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF
  • Shared capabilities: 1 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeLakeraPromptfoo
Founded20212024
HeadquartersZurich, SwitzerlandSan Francisco, US
Employees51-10011-50
FundingSeries A, $20M raised (July 2024), led by Atomico with participation from Citi Ventures, Dropbox Ventures, and redalpine. Prior seed of $10M (2023) led by redalpine. Total raised: $30M.$23.4M total (Series A, July 2025)
PricingEnterprise-focused SaaS. No public pricing listed. API-based pricing model expected. Contact sales.Contact for pricing
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkLakeraPromptfoo
EU AI ActPartial
NIST AI RMFPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityLakeraPromptfoo
LLM Evaluation
LLM Guardrails & Content Filtering
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Prompt Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow
Third-Party AI Vendor Risk

Industries served

Lakera

  • SaaS & Technology
  • Education
  • Financial Services

Promptfoo

  • Healthcare
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Lakera

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API

Promptfoo

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Jenkins

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Lakera and Promptfoo and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.