Holistic AI vs LatticeFlow AI

Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.

Canonical URL: https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/holistic-ai-vs-latticeflow-ai

Holistic AI

End-to-end AI governance built on UCL-grounded research.

Holistic AI is an enterprise AI governance platform founded in 2020 and spun out of University College London by Dr. Adriano Koshiyama and Dr. Emre Kazim. Headquartered in London with a US presence, Holistic AI provides model discovery, risk assessment, bias and robustness testing, and continuous monitoring across an organization's AI portfolio — including agents, LLMs, and classic ML. The company has built a strong research footprint in algorithmic auditing.

Last verified April 21, 2026London, United Kingdom

LatticeFlow AI

A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.

LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.

Last verified April 22, 2026Zurich, Switzerland

What the data shows

We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.

  • Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
  • Only Holistic AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144, UK AI Framework
  • Shared capabilities: 9 of 9 listed.

Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.

At a glance

AttributeHolistic AILatticeFlow AI
Founded20202020
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomZurich, Switzerland
Employees51-20011-50
FundingSeed + Series A (undisclosed)Series A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021).
PricingEnterprise-only with modular pricing by use case.No public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing.
WebsiteVisit siteVisit site

Framework coverage

FrameworkHolistic AILatticeFlow AI
Colorado AI ActFull
EU AI ActFullFull
GDPR Art. 22Partial
ISO/IEC 42001FullFull
NIST AI RMFFullFull
NYC LL 144Full
UK AI FrameworkPartial

Capabilities

CapabilityHolistic AILatticeFlow AI
AI Model Inventory
Audit Evidence Collection
Bias & Fairness Testing
Explainability
LLM Red Teaming
Model Monitoring
Policy Management
Regulatory Intelligence
Risk Assessment Workflow

Industries served

Holistic AI

  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Employment & HR
  • SaaS & Technology

LatticeFlow AI

  • Financial Services
  • Defense & National Security
  • SaaS & Technology

Integrations

Holistic AI

  • AWS SageMaker
  • Azure ML
  • Google Vertex AI
  • Databricks
  • Snowflake
  • MLflow
  • GitHub
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • ServiceNow

LatticeFlow AI

  • OpenAI API
  • GitHub

Get quotes from both

Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Holistic AI and LatticeFlow AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.

Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.

Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.