Holistic AI vs LatticeFlow AI
Side-by-side comparison of framework coverage, pricing, capabilities, and target customers. Last verified recently.
https://aicompliancevendors.com/compare/holistic-ai-vs-latticeflow-aiHolistic AI
End-to-end AI governance built on UCL-grounded research.
Holistic AI is an enterprise AI governance platform founded in 2020 and spun out of University College London by Dr. Adriano Koshiyama and Dr. Emre Kazim. Headquartered in London with a US presence, Holistic AI provides model discovery, risk assessment, bias and robustness testing, and continuous monitoring across an organization's AI portfolio — including agents, LLMs, and classic ML. The company has built a strong research footprint in algorithmic auditing.
LatticeFlow AI
A single platform to discover, evaluate and govern risk to secure your AI future.
LatticeFlow AI is a Swiss deep-tech company headquartered in Zurich, spun out of ETH Zurich in 2020, that provides a platform for AI security and governance centered on deep technical evaluations. The company co-created COMPL-AI, the first open-source evaluation framework mapping EU AI Act requirements to concrete technical controls for generative AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and INSAIT. This positions LatticeFlow AI as a primary reference for EU AI Act compliance-centered AI assessments. The platform covers agentic AI risk assessment, foundation model risk screening, automated AI security red-teaming, and continuous AI governance operations. It is listed in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms and the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI TRiSM. Customers include global wealth management institutions, Axpo (energy), defense organizations, and Swiss Federal Railways.
What the data shows
We haven't published an editorial verdict on this pair yet. The comparison below is built from public vendor materials and our taxonomy — no editorialized ranking.
- Shared framework coverage: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF
- Only Holistic AI covers: Colorado AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, NYC LL 144, UK AI Framework
- Shared capabilities: 9 of 9 listed.
Want our editorial take? Email the editors or read our methodology.
At a glance
| Attribute | Holistic AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Employees | 51-200 | 11-50 |
| Funding | Seed + Series A (undisclosed) | Series A, $12M raised (October 2022), led by Atlantic Bridge and OpenOcean with participation from FPV Ventures. Prior seed of $2.8M (January 2021). |
| Pricing | Enterprise-only with modular pricing by use case. | No public pricing. Enterprise platform sold via direct sales. Contact sales for demo and pricing. |
| Website | Visit site | Visit site |
Framework coverage
| Framework | Holistic AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado AI Act | Full | — |
| EU AI Act | Full | Full |
| GDPR Art. 22 | Partial | — |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | Full | Full |
| NIST AI RMF | Full | Full |
| NYC LL 144 | Full | — |
| UK AI Framework | Partial | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Holistic AI | LatticeFlow AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model Inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit Evidence Collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bias & Fairness Testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Explainability | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM Red Teaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Regulatory Intelligence | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Assessment Workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
Industries served
Holistic AI
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Insurance
- Employment & HR
- SaaS & Technology
LatticeFlow AI
- Financial Services
- Defense & National Security
- SaaS & Technology
Integrations
Holistic AI
- AWS SageMaker
- Azure ML
- Google Vertex AI
- Databricks
- Snowflake
- MLflow
- GitHub
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic API
- ServiceNow
LatticeFlow AI
- OpenAI API
- GitHub
Get quotes from both
Want a side-by-side proposal? Send a single structured request to Holistic AI and LatticeFlow AI and each will reply with scope, pricing, and timelines. You'll see exactly what we share before submitting.
Vendors pay a flat per-lead fee when they receive a qualified request. That fee does not influence what you see on this page. Details.
Editorial independence: This comparison is free and was not paid for by either vendor. See our methodology.